English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The controle of world economy is the dream of Mr. Bush. Many of his decitions are seems to be ruthless attempts of lucrative money-mania. Many torrorists also aim accumulation of money. isn't it?

2007-02-11 15:45:29 · 26 answers · asked by Udayambili. 1 in Politics & Government Politics

26 answers

Most injustices are made in the attempt to do something good.
Bush mistakenly believes that he is doing good, when actually he is doing exactly what you describe, killing innocent people.

2007-02-11 15:57:37 · answer #1 · answered by Lou B 4 · 0 2

No, I think he has a misguided view of the world where the Bush administration believes that the whole world would be better off under democracy. I think he wanted a moderate Islamic country like Turkey. However, some countries and some people understand only the rule of an iron fist. Saddam and Iraq was the perfect example. Iraqis understood rule at the end of a gun barrel. Their politicians now don't have any power unless they are backed by a militia. We as Americans don't understand that democracy is not for everybody. Basically, our major problem is that we need oil. When we give up on our foreign dependence, I think the Middle East (Except for the UAE) will be in a world of hurt.

2007-02-11 19:42:47 · answer #2 · answered by Kenneth C 6 · 0 0

Look up the definition of war and you will find, people die. The good, the innocent and the bad. Bush, in an effort to limit the number of innocent people getting killed, has tied the hands of our troops. Good thing you were not around spouting your liberal propaganda during World War 2 when the Allies were carpet bombing Berlin, Dresden and many other cities. Some local citizens would bring a short rope and a tall tree and watch you swing cause back then, it was anti American and pro Nazi. Many of these people you claim Bush killed, were killed by terrorists and their car bombs and suicide bombers which, are not under control of President Bush. Try again, you still are not going to make your point, no matter how stupid it is, that Bush is the cause of all the world troubles. Look at the nut cases in North Korea, Iran, Venezuela just to name a few. These are the people responsible for all the world tensions, not Bush and Not Clinton or any other American President.

2016-05-23 23:40:03 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I thank God that George Bush was president in the aftermath of 911. You think we have problems in the ME now, we haven't seen the problems that would have arisen had we a Dem in the WH then. I think George Bush is doing his best to protect this country and our freedoms that countless men and not a few women have died for. I think George Bush is a good man leading a nation comprised largely of ingrates who just don't have a clue.

2007-02-11 15:58:16 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

No. George W Bush is the democratrically elected leader of the United States of America. His goal is to protect America & Americans. If others stopped trying to kill us, there would be peace.

2007-02-11 16:20:11 · answer #5 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0 0

Yes...he murdered 3000 innocent people when he blew up the World Trade Center. This gave him the green light to invade Iraq where hundereds of thousands have died.

2007-02-11 17:03:09 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Controlling the entire world by sharia is the dream of the Muslim crooks. Bush took this idea from them and now showing them how others would feel under religious oppression. Have a taste of your own receipe.

2007-02-11 15:52:50 · answer #7 · answered by liketoaskq 5 · 2 1

It is a common analysis that the American rulers will prove their mettle in the areas pertaining to the poverty stricken countries. You can see in past histories they have proved their military powers in Japan, Afghanistan. No war has been previously faced in the border of America. Not only Bush, any president of America will do the same.

2007-02-11 16:00:31 · answer #8 · answered by vijayakumar n 2 · 0 2

not bush. but definitely chenney.

and to all the previous answers: what are you all thinking?!?!?!? OF COURSE. The iraq war has nothing to do with terrorism. Iraq had nothing to do with Bin Laden, Hussein actually hated Bin Laden. The whole war was for the oil!!!! WAKE UP PEOPLE!!!
If National security was so important, what happened to Afganistan and Bin Laden? We seemed to have forgotten it?!?

2007-02-11 15:52:57 · answer #9 · answered by qwerqwerqweqwe 1 · 1 1

Well if you call the security of the USA a crooked aim then I'll buy it and think it's a good deal.

2007-02-11 15:49:45 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers