the article is false advertisement just looking to get money. dan rad, emme & rupert AND tom (draco malfoy) are all signed up & ready to start filming HBP in a few weeks. also, christian is rumored to return for his role of the young lord voldemort tom riddle jr....
this is on older cast list off wiki:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harry_Potter_and_the_Half-Blood_Prince_(film)
then emma watson is part of the cast:
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0417741/fullcredits
updated from attached to actually being on the list now:
http://www.tvguide.com/detail/movie.aspx?tvobjectid=285362&more=uccastanddetails
so we will definitly have dan emme & rupert for part 6...there's only one more movie to go so WB would be real stupid to cut dan off.
even if there was more then one movie to go, WB would still be stupid to cut him off for nude scenes. dan is NOT the first HP actor...or actress for that matter...to have nude scenes! & technically, its sorta not his first *cough bath scene in GOF cough* (i know he was wearing something that was off screen but still the audeince is left to assume.."OH! he's in a bath, who wears clothes in a bath right?") ANYway....dan's not the first HP actor/actress in this subject. alan rickman probably is...& if not..close enough. not to mention ian hart,(pro quirrel) gary oldman (sirius black) & especially david thewlis(remus lupin). also, these HP actors not only had such scenes...they were GAY scenes. at least dan had a hetro one right? oh as well as beastility. oops! & the david thewlis gay scene, know who his "lover" is? leonardo dicaprio! (go look for the movie total eclipse! guess remus isnt to gentile after all is he?[wink])
& dan's not even the first out of the young HP actors/actresses for this. clemence posy (fluer de lacour) anyone? she had a nude scene a long time ago when she was around dan's age.
like i say WB would be really stupid. it would be as if they prejudice against dan rad if they dropped him for doing some nude scene when everone else in HP has already been there, done it.
2007-02-11 15:53:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by swordofmystique 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The only reason Radcliffe (and his co starts) might get the boot is because they are now older that the Harry in the books.
Somehow I doubt they will get rid of them at this point
2007-02-11 23:33:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I haven't heard that and I think that if they do kick him off the films the movies will not be the same he is Harry truly
2007-02-11 23:28:16
·
answer #3
·
answered by ♥Ta Loca♥ 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
i dont see that really happening,any way it would be his last time playing Harry seeing this book is her last. His the only face kids and potter fans know,so i dont see them getting a new Harry and risk losing big bucks at the box office.....
2007-02-11 23:30:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by Porcelain Doll 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Check on the Daily Mail
2007-02-12 05:49:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by xaexxx 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
i read that the last "harry Potter" movie will be out this summer...never heard about him being "kicked" off
2007-02-11 23:27:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by valgalallen 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It would not be Harry Potter without him!
2007-02-11 23:30:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by shootingstarr82 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
they cant recast harry cuz he is the face of harry potter. if they did. there would be a worldwide protest and everyone would hate them. i will definitely lead one of those protests too.
2007-02-11 23:59:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by cutiekat913 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe that would be a stupid movie that in the end would only hurt them, and the people who decide to watch it
2007-02-11 23:38:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by Angelically Evil 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think he dies in the next movie
2007-02-12 00:28:05
·
answer #10
·
answered by my place 2
·
0⤊
0⤋