I've been through some eight presidents; have been able to vote in at least as many presidential elections, and would love to see a female president in my lifetime. Hillary is not for me, though. I find her to be too rude, crude, and shrewd--not to mention we'd be screwed. :)
2007-02-11 15:16:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by Holiday Magic 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
"As democracy is perfected, the office of president represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their heart's desire at last and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron." - H.L. Mencken
No. I do not trust Bhillary.
Let me post an email I received from her through Yahoo Email and you will see why.
Not that I had not already ascertained she is very dangerous.
Hello Barbara L (barbaralee15),
You have received a message from another user!
From: Hillary Clinton
Subject: Re: My credibility as Hillary Rodahm Clinton
Message: As you know, our beloved country has suffered dearly, and I believe all this hatred, whether it be jihad, or the mossad, or extremists, all operate at the same level - why?
They all study the koran, which is the handbook of Islam.
As you know, Bill and I, are Jewish. We understand your book teaches all of you incorrect ways and it is somewhat Islams that fault the followers take Muhammeds(pbuh) writings literally.
Anyway, hope to get your vote in 2008!
Bye,
Hillary Clinton.
I went to her 360 and found it to have some distinctly anti Muslim comments.
http://www.infowars.com/cartoons_2.htm
Check the 4th down
http://www.infowars.com/cartoons_5.htm
The woman is shrill and classless. But dangerous.
Now if THIS woman were running for President or Prime Minister I would go for her - Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf, Liberia's 'Iron Lady'.
She ran on the platform of a Grandmother in charge. In that culture, the Grandmother of the family wields great power and is held in high regard.
2007-02-11 15:12:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by Noor al Haqiqa 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
NO WAY! i think that would be awesome and amazing seeing a woman as president, maybe they can do better then all these guys...
so i defiantly wouldn't refrain from voting for a female
but i would refrain from Hillary Clinton, because i think shes an idiot...
2007-02-11 15:12:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
No way! I wouldn't vote for her because she's not very
kind in my opinion,& while I care about the gays & the
homosexuals very much as friends ect.... I don't want
someone like Rosie O'Donnald making a pass at me
but I am happy that most homosexuals are not like her.
I don't want Hilary thinking she can get away with allowing
lesbians & homosexuals with anger issues run over us
straight females who have no desire to be gay!!!
2007-02-11 20:46:24
·
answer #4
·
answered by Dyannah 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Not because she's a female. I think a woman could do wonders for this country. I t would have to be an almost perfect one. Her qualifications should be: 1) INTEGRITY, 2) WISDOM, 3) COMMON SENSE, (its just as important as wisdom), 4) WIFE & MOTHER (she must know the reality of life). My strong reason for not voting for Hilary is because she will be just a front for Mr. Clinton (her husband). He in reality would be running our Nation.
2007-02-11 15:28:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by Debs 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
If an American Margaret Thatcher were to run, I'd be happy to vote for her. I won't vote for Hillary because I think she's corrupt and I know she's a leftist who wants to greatly expand the power of the government. One Clinton was more than enough.
2007-02-11 15:27:20
·
answer #6
·
answered by Prof 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
No, I'd refrain voting for Hillary because I don't like her flipflopping.
"Now, I believe the facts that have brought us to this fateful vote are not in doubt. Saddam Hussein is a tyrant who has tortured and killed his own people, even his own family members, to maintain his iron grip on power. He used chemical weapons on Iraqi Kurds and on Iranians, killing over 20 thousand people... As a condition for ending the conflict, the United Nations imposed a number of requirements on Iraq, among them disarmament of all weapons of mass destruction, stocks used to make such weapons, and laboratories necessary to do the work. Saddam Hussein agreed, and an inspection system was set up to ensure compliance. And though he repeatedly lied, delayed, and obstructed the inspections work, the inspectors found and destroyed far more weapons of mass destruction capability than were destroyed in the Gulf War, including thousands of chemical weapons, large volumes of chemical and biological stocks, a number of missiles and warheads, a major lab equipped to produce anthrax and other bio-weapons, as well as substantial nuclear facilities... And finally, on another personal note, I come to this decision from the perspective of a Senator from New York who has seen all too closely the consequences of last year's terrible attacks on our nation. In balancing the risks of action versus inaction, I think New Yorkers who have gone through the fires of hell may be more attuned to the risk of not acting. I know that I am. So it is with conviction that I support this resolution as being in the best interests of our nation."
- Hillary Clinton 10/10/2002
Now she's saying that there was bad information and we rushed to war? She changes her stance to whatever will win her the next immediate election. I'm just waiting for her to say that she's pro-life when talking to the south...
I also don't like her background as a lawyer, but I think that's just me being normal. (Not ALL lawyers are evil...)
2007-02-11 15:37:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I would refrain from voting for Hillary not because she is a woman (she acts more like a man anyway) but because of:
Compulsive Liar
Obstructor of Justice (Whitewater)
Arrogant creep
Socialist
Tax and spendaholic.
2007-02-11 15:14:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
I would love to have the joy of seeing the first non-white, non-male US president in my lifetime. Hillary is a very poor choice. I also feel that we need to stop electing politicians to lead our nation. I feel that we need to have a real citizen in charge!! I'd vote for Arnold if he was able to run. As stupid as it may sound, we need to have an average citizen as president. A person who has to budget every single penny in order to survive. Who knows the horrors of poverty. I would guarantee you that our budget would get straightened out, our foreign affairs would improve, the health of our nation would improve. The national poverty level would LOWER.
2007-02-11 18:43:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by Aesea 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Will not vote for Hillary and I am a Democrat
2007-02-11 16:19:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by cwigg 3
·
1⤊
0⤋