2007-02-11 14:22:17 · 17 answers · asked by WJ 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I like President Bush,but Mt.Rushmore is a little soon.Future generations will make that decision.
2007-02-11 14:27:28 · answer #1 · answered by jnwmom 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Nay.
2007-02-11 22:24:58 · answer #2 · answered by Timothy M 5 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Mount Rushmore is for great presidents, not for the worst ones, so no.
2007-02-11 22:27:06 · answer #3 · answered by brian2412 7 · 6⤊ 3⤋
Nay!!
2007-02-11 22:26:34 · answer #4 · answered by usserydog 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
I say go for it, and throw in Reagan as well. Here's a preview i found:
http://i59.photobucket.com/albums/g305/Swaggstone/rushmore.jpg
2007-02-11 22:34:02 · answer #5 · answered by Third Uncle 5 · 3⤊ 2⤋
That would be a genuine act of vandalism. But I think both he and Ronald Reagan would fit on the back end of Crazy Horse's steed, another rock-carved monument in South Dakota........
2007-02-11 22:28:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 5⤋
Probably not. Maybe Reagan
http://www.conservativeworld.us/
2007-02-11 22:40:33 · answer #7 · answered by Cowboy 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I have a Mt. Trashmore close to me, they'd do real well there.
2007-02-11 22:31:13 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
We won't know that for several decades. You can't accurately judge a president until many years after he has left office.
2007-02-11 22:28:13 · answer #9 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Reagan
2007-02-11 22:26:37 · answer #10 · answered by C B 6 · 3⤊ 7⤋