If it was good enough for Petr Kilma then it's good enough for Sidney Crosby.
2007-02-12 03:45:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by Oscar LeRoy 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
If you mean that thing in your picture then NO. Leave the helmets that have on alone. If the argument was about should they wear visors or not then that might be an argument to have.
2007-02-11 22:21:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yep, And the Manditory Goggles/Visor as well.
Wouldn't that make even a Columbus vs. Phoenix game fun to watch.
2007-02-11 22:27:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by Dig Em 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes and they should play "Liquor and whores" at every home game.
Konky should be the mascot.
The team name should be the Green Bastards.
Whenever they score the crowd would start chanting "propane,propane"
2007-02-12 12:52:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by mapleleafskickass 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yeah, it looks just like Butch Goring's helmet.
2007-02-12 01:40:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by michinoku2001 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No......
Hockey already has enough comic relief with Gary Bettman in charge
2007-02-12 08:40:55
·
answer #6
·
answered by Joe Crow 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'd say no, because if I was in the NHL, I wouldn't want to look retarded either.
2007-02-11 22:10:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by Kimi 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
whats you helmet like?
2007-02-11 21:42:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by fubs123 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think it should be up to the individual player if they want to wear
them.
2007-02-12 10:50:25
·
answer #9
·
answered by PARTSGUY 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
without a doubt
2007-02-12 00:14:25
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋