Who has the better creative team, WWE or TNA?

Question

I think TNA's creative content is better, maybe because it's only an hour so they only show the best stuff.

Answer 1

WWE

Answer 2

WWE's storylines are stale and tasteless. TNA's got a fresh perspective on the industry. The only problem TNA has is Russo ending every feud with a really crappy Russoriffic gimmick match.

What it all comes down to is I think people mistake booking for writing. WWE can book the hell out of a show, even if it is gluing random crap together that overall isn't particularly new or entertaining. TNA has a great writing staff, but they have Russo working the books. Don't get me wrong, both utilize their time well, but both also have a lot of filler like VKM or (even though it's godly and hilarious) PCS in TNA, and DX, Vince McMahon's, and Team RKO's scuttlebutt card filling antics. Overall, I give it to TNA

Answer 3

For one hour a week. TNA's are usually better.
They have a lot of really good storylines going on at once

Cage-Angle,Aj-Rhino,3d-lax,lynn-Senshi, even down to the naturals and Shane douglas and Chris Daniels depression. They have about 10 solid storylines but only 4 hours a month to progress them.

And i think the matches usually have more creative endings, are better scripted matches, and usually the gimmick matches are really innovative.

But then on tna with Russo you end up getting stuff like that Christy Hemme match or something that may be really silly and over the top (like the Abyss attempted murder thing). Or the bad gimmicks like whatever Bob Backland keeps doing or Ron Killings gimmick as "a rapper/wrestler that keeps getting in crappy movies despite the fact he cant act'" (which is a funny cheap shot but not a good gimmick).

My fear with Russo is that he can kill a career (remember his 3 gimmicks for Mike Awesome in wcw)

But in general i think Tna creative is better. wwe has about 4 storylines at a time, half of them are dumb, and the other 90% of the wrestlers are ignored. Not to mention the lame gimmicks wwe keeps giving people. Boogeyman, enough said

Answer 4

with the money they have , they do a pretty good job of using it. but i prefer wwe. i think tna's ok but they need a better story/writers. wwe has a bigger list of superstars thus leading to more viewers. anyways about ur question im not really sure. but it is true they stuff everything in 1 hour.

Answer 5

WWE has a better creative content. I always like it.

Answer 6

Tna as it just keeps getting better day by day.it has got Samoa Joe,Kurt Angle,Sting,Abyss,AJ Styles,Christopher Daniels and many more......wat else would u want other than these superstars and the storylines are just awesome.

Answer 7

WWE is way better than TNA will ever be

Answer 8

i think of TNA has a solid inventive group and robust thoughts yet i do no longer think of they're as centred on the wrestling as you would be able to think of. they're putting on a coach, fairly some issues on TNA has no longer something to do with wrestling like the Dr. Stevie segments, or the time group christian brutally beat down Abyss and decrease him up with barbwire bats tell he replace into bleeding from head to toe, that wasn't wrestling. WWE has carried out a similar style of stuff and worst on their programming, so i'm no longer putting down TNA, yet they're basically like WWE, while it is composed of wrestling, and that they choose a coach that does nicely interior the scores, they choose to sell merchandise, thats why they have the hot perspective, Nash, and Taz shirts on sale different at their web site, and that they went to sell PPVs. TNA needs greater followers and for this reason they sign vast names like perspective, Sting, and Booker T, and that's the reason of them doing edgier thoughts than WWE, provided that is going to be the quickest way for them to attraction to new followers. i'm hoping TNA is going on for a protracted time, they have carried out greater advantageous than maximum wrestling agencies have interior the 7 yrs they have been around, and think of they're going to accomplish much greater, I would desire to provide definitely everyone at TNA credit for what they're doing, via fact they're putting on a brilliant coach, I take excitement in it. snapping factor would not sound like a number of TNA PPVs to me.

Answer 9

tna creative team is better

Answer 10

tna i like wwe more but im really into the abyss and sting storyline

Answer 11

You couldnt be more right.Every time wwe tries something new it falls on its face then then they sweep the cob webs off of old idea's and there not working anymore.