even after 9/11, and then told America that he wasn't a priority at all...even after 9/11, why is Obama's name a big deal?
2007-02-11 12:43:11 · 10 answers · asked by like a BOSS 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
The other person who answered is dead on. Bill Clinton was the one who just let the guy "just walk away". I have to assume that since he hasn't been on a videotape for years, that Bush got him and now he is just some cloud of dust floating over in the Middle East.
2007-02-11 12:55:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yahoo came up with a pretty cool tool here. And it seems that people want to use it as a chat room to spew more talking points.
Beach man is correct. Last time Bin Laden was in the scope of a rifle was under Hilary Clinton's I mean Bill Clinton's watch.
Turn off the local scews and turn on some real news. Start developing an opinion of your own, EVERYBODY, and let go of the talking points.
2007-02-11 20:56:46 · answer #2 · answered by Joe P 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Why isn't he looking for Osama because he don't want to. I've and heard things about Bush and the 9/11 attacks. This by far has to be the best thing Ive ever heard. Bush wants loan of a great sum of money but because of a law that was passed by (I forget the name) states that the president can only get a loan in one of two ways
1. Natural Disasters
2 If the nation were to be at war
So hes rejected. 2 weeks later planes crash in to the World Trade Center and we go to war. He never planed on trying to capture Osama. His real plan was to finish what his daddy start in the late 80's to the early 90's. So I answer your question with another question if we had troops in Afghanistan ever since how come more money is spent on Iraq when the attack was clearly Bin Ladens doing and how come as weeks go by you hear less and less about the war in Afghanistan? This is of course Bush's doing he in fact wants us as Americans to forget who was the really enemy and look away as he runs and hides. While we attack a country who had nothing to do with the attacks and spending all this money there we could have invested this and could have found Bin Laden by now. When Bush announced that we were going to war with Iraq he stated that they have weapons of mass destruction. While its been about 6 years and guess what still no weapons. Gee I wounder why........ If you haven't figured it out yet this was an excuse to enter Iraq and while this attack was going on it gave him a time period to get away. Ok to speed things up Saddam's dead so why are we still there oh yeah thats right we caused a civil war and whats going on in Afghanistan who knows they sure haven't found him yet. So this my point if we stayed focused on the main idea and and didn't stop and for detours the man who caused 1000's of death that day could have been captured by now. Its really sad that we have turned a blind eye on this topic and I wounder how many people still remember that hey were at war with Afghanistan I wounder why............
2007-02-11 21:19:56 · answer #3 · answered by juggalokilla75 1 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Sorry sweety, but that was Clinton that had Osama in his sites, and let him walk. Osama planed, and succeeded in attacking more than once under Clinton. Remember, our embassy, the USS Cole, the WTC in the 90's? I love it when you Libs make asses out of yourselves by not having your facts straight. Furthermore, no attacks since 911 under Bush.
2007-02-11 21:40:08 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The average voter reads and believes the National Enquirer. You don't think those two names being one letter off is going to have an impact?
The idiots are confused enough already, it will not take much of a push. In fact, the garbage is already flying on that point.
-Dio
2007-02-11 20:50:56 · answer #5 · answered by diogenese19348 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Slick Willy, good ole Clinton had at least 3 chances to get Bin Laden. Now he is hiding somewhere that we will never be able to find him. Blaming the wrong guy.
2007-02-11 21:04:02 · answer #6 · answered by redneckking_99 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Osama Bin Laden is a S.O.B but He is our S.O.B.that's why he is walking free.
2007-02-11 21:03:36 · answer #7 · answered by Dr.O 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Hey, Mr. Not-so-Intelligent...........Slick Willie let him get away. I don't like Bush either but at least he didn't screw that thing up. It was Bill.
2007-02-11 20:50:59 · answer #8 · answered by Beachman 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
It isn't except to the last 30% who support the moron George. His name is his name, and I have a friend named George!! I don't that against him!!
2007-02-11 20:47:58 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Actually he hasn't... you are misstating the question.
2007-02-11 21:02:10 · answer #10 · answered by lordkelvin 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋