Is spanking outlawed in California? And if it is..when was this law made?

Answer 1

No, but there is a bill in the state House that outlines the appropriate ages for spanking/non-spanking.

Child abuse is illegal; however, what constitutes child abuse should be determined on a case by case basis.

Personally, I think the shame of being spanked is enough punishment to the child, as opposed to increasing the infliction of pain. If the latter is used as a deterrent, the child will eventually become immune to the pain, and his behavior will not be affected.

Raising your voice while spanking the child, instead of increasing the pain, works better.

Answer 2

If it isn't oulawed, corporal punishment should be! It teaches nothing positive, short circuits the development of internal controls and a conscience, and is almost always done because the person is angry! That is how kids die from Shaken Baby Syndrome! Their crime? They were crying and someone got pissed!

And don't give me this spare the rod crap! Sheepherders "rod" was to guide their sheep! They NEVER hit one with it!

The government protecting chilren comes from the Magna Carta and British Common Law. It is known as parens patriae!

parens patriae (paa-wrens pat-tree-eye) n. Latin for "father of his country," the term for the doctrine that the government is the ultimate guardian of all people under a disability, especially children, whose care is only "entrusted" to their parents. Under this doctrine, in a divorce action or a guardianship application the court retains jurisdiction until the child is 18 years old, and a judge may change custody, child support or other rulings affecting the child's well-being, no matter what the parents may have agreed or the court previously decided. (See: divorce, custody, child support, guardian, ward)

Answer 3

i do no longer think of it would be REQUIRED, besides the indisputable fact that it style of feels ridiculous to make it unlawful. sometimes that's the only thank you to get with the aid of to 3 young infants, or what they did is undesirable sufficient to warrant it. regulations forbidding, or requiring spankings are too arbitrary. the baby, and the circumstances; alongside with the parenting would desire to be certain. I parent the regulations against it are overreactive backlash from the circumstances the place "spanking" became a hide for "beating". there's a line between a spanking, and a beating. The regulation would be extra acceptable served in determining the place that line is, and making valuable the voters understand and admire the version.

Answer 4

Some idiot Democrat from Mountain View, CA propose a law to outlaw spanking to a child of 3 or younger. I don't think it passed. I wonder why Liberals think it's ok for the government to interfer with the upbringing of our children, yet they oppose the government to take measures to protect us from terrorist attacks. They call that invasion of privacy. Very hypocritical.

Answer 5

Don't worry, Rio - as I understand it the law has only as yet been proposed, not passed, and in any case it only refers to parents spanking kids under three. You can still get yourself spanked to your heart's content.

Answer 6

If not, it should be, parents should not hit their children! Parents should teach their children good ethics and respect. Then, their children won't want to behave because they will not want to disrespect their parents.

Answer 7

no you just are not allowed to leave marks on your children