all the time, or just when it's a republican president?
I remember that republicans said it's ok to support the troops and not the president when Clinton was in office, but now that doesn't seem to apply.
2007-02-11 12:30:36 · 9 answers · asked by like a BOSS 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
No it is NOT treason..going against the constitution is TREASON !!
2007-02-11 13:32:07 · answer #1 · answered by Kathy 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I have seen all presidents criticized, since John Kennedy, I do not think it is treasonous to disagree with the way the president is running the country. Clinton took it as well as anybody, especially the unfounded accusations from the repuglicans. It would seem if there was a Ken Star for the democratic party that by now George Bush would be gone for all the evil and misdeeds causing tens of thousands of lives that he has done.
2007-02-11 12:56:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Wrong....most of the Republican congress was supportive of Clinton's war policy in Bosnia and the Strikes against Iraq.
What treasonous is the continual support of the enemy we are fighting now.....all you have to do is read the papers and see the news and all the bombings that take out leaders are less important than the the civilian life that was taken....the enemy has used the media as a means to get support from the democrats and the public.
Afghanistan was pretty much in control until the media started portraying the IEDs and suicide bombers as an effective way to get public opinion to sway against the war in Iraq...now Afghanistan is beginning to see the same results.....so yes it would be treasonists to be openly opinionated against the war and the efforts our troops are working against..it emboldens the enemy and gives them ideas on how to defeat us.
2007-02-11 12:44:53 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Treason is the act of betraying ones usa or sovereign. i do no longer likely think of any of those circumstances would be considered treason. As no person is being betrayed. except having a difference of opinion to the chief is punishable via dying (which treason is). And that's no longer u.s. have been speaking approximately. those are different international places. I help the militia coup of the militia to deposit a scumbag of a pacesetter. u.s. has no criminal accountability to alter our regulations via fact of distant places rigidity different than if it have been an act of warfare. Isreal has to combat every day in an area surrounded via people who would love no longer something below isreals finished annilhaltion. And we would desire to continually no longer have faith what the whitehouse mentioned relating to the funds as that's plenty worse than maximum would suspect yet they sugar coat it. How the hell is saying "**** you" to something of the worldwide an act of treason? in certainty i come across this the different.
2016-11-03 04:49:59 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is treason NOT to criticize the President. For the American people rule this Country not a stupid redneck no matter what he thinks.
2007-02-11 12:39:32 · answer #5 · answered by George B 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
If it were then we'd all be in prison and the politicians would have no one to govern.
2007-02-11 13:14:51 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, but spreading unfounded propaganda in wartime against him and our country most certainly is.
2007-02-11 13:06:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
We voted for a bush.soon we will vote for a multinational homeboy.when will we vote Mexican??
2007-02-11 12:42:58 · answer #8 · answered by stratoframe 5 · 0⤊ 4⤋
woo
impeach the jerk
2007-02-11 12:38:46 · answer #9 · answered by cork 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋