Just show us some real proof before you commit more soldiers to the cause Mr President, it's all we ask.
2007-02-11 12:16:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
No. Even though the weapons that they supplied Iraq are VERY destructive, they are not WMD, because they are not wiping out an extreme number of people (ex. Hiroshima) to be really considered WMD. What is the number of people that have to be killed in order for a weapon to be considered a WMD? Well, I can't answer that one.
(By the way what was wrong with my question?)
2007-02-11 20:30:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by pawt72 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is the problem isn't it - because of all the false information about Iraq, no one will believe any information about Iran, true or not. I know I won't, without absolute proof confirmed by an independent source.
2007-02-11 20:25:49
·
answer #3
·
answered by ash 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
what I would love to see is Bush invading another Sovereign nation and basically every country in the world condem it. I would love to see mass US troops saying screw this and leaving just drop their guns and leave. We all know its BS again the first time it was based on intelligence (???). Mr Whatada wont be lonely thats for sure.
2007-02-11 20:31:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
And you are willing to take a chance with your life and mine? Just to be able to bash Bush? Your thinking is delusional, you haven't a clue!
2007-02-11 20:32:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Would you rather that it got to that point before its stopped?
2007-02-11 20:26:36
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is a great stupid question.Thankyou.You do see eye to spy
2007-02-11 20:17:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by stratoframe 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
reason shiit man ,,BOMB IRAN NOW,,I have decided it,,,decider
2007-02-11 20:18:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋