by being extortinately charged for a rail season ticket and then being treated no better than cattle, squashed into a carriage and having to endure a uncomfortable journey paked in like sardines
2007-02-11 10:18:08 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
While you keep putting up with it, the rail co. wont change. They have got everybody over a barrell. As for human rights, what are they??? As you said, if cattle were treated that way, there would be trouble!!
2007-02-15 08:34:22 · answer #1 · answered by debs7405 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That they be, friend! But rights are being infringed and disregarded all the time- not just by the federal governement or city governments, either. But neverthelesssssssssss! However, on the same token, you don't have to take the first bus that comes to the bus stop, depending when you have to get to where it is you're going- if it's a city bus, that is. If it's Grey Hound, or another bus ssystem like that, then you have to get the one you bought a ticket or pass for. Good luck in solving this matter.
2007-02-11 10:43:10 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
definite, that's obtainable. some international locations haven't any authentic restraint on authorities authority, and the authorities can effectively bypass any guidelines it needs. case in point, the united kingdom has no structure, and the united kingdom parliament ought to bypass any regulation it needed to (inspite of the actual shown actuality that there is an insurrection if it did). In different international locations, there is constitutional limits on some rights to end the authorities infringing them, yet there is not any u . s . that has constitutional protections adversarial to each and each unmarried straight forward acceptable interior the international. that's in part because diverse human beings have very diverse recommendations as to what surely constitutes "straight forward human rights". case in point, many human beings evaluate the right to personal a firearm to be an uncomplicated and basic human acceptable. Many uk electorate do not. As such, that's obtainable for a regulation to be exceeded that, in a persons' eyes a minimum of, violates peoples' rights.
2016-11-27 01:54:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends on what your being charged and why your on the rail instead of driving your own vehicle. I cant stand public transportation anymore. Ugh.
Even so, transportation is not a human right, or how you get it.
2007-02-11 10:23:25 · answer #4 · answered by fivefootnuttinhuny 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Henry, If you have a complaint why not talk to the rail road operator. If you buy cheap tickets just remember you get what you pay for.
2007-02-11 10:22:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
does paking hurt
2007-02-11 10:20:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
no as i think there are other ways to travel, camels or hot air balloons spring to mind, so it is entirely voluntary on your part.
2007-02-11 10:27:34 · answer #7 · answered by nacnuds 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
What human rights..ur i n the freakin uk what do you expect, armchairs and champagne!
2007-02-11 10:33:01 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
hey was you not charged for using electricity or diesel..check it out .lol.
2007-02-11 10:25:44 · answer #9 · answered by raybbies 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes I think so.
2007-02-11 10:25:34 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋