That Balance News now = US Crap
2007-02-11 08:08:08 · 14 answers · asked by Taco . 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Your question presupposes that FOX ever had any credibility to begin with. Fox has been America's #1 propaganda source since its inception. It's beyond me how anyone can seriously call anything they present "news." "Junk Food News" would be a better way to describe it. A People's magazine disguised as a news network.
Sadly, CNN isn't much better.
NO mainstream media challenged the Bush administration's war cries. If they had, they would have been viewed as UNpatriotic, and no media corporation wants that tag on them. Neither Fox or CNN get points for their handling of the American Invasion of Iraq.
2007-02-11 08:14:30 · answer #1 · answered by Tom K 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
none overall, but people will pick and choose what they want to hear and if a news channel supports their opinion that is the channel that they will watch.
it is really up the company officers to make sure that they deliver balanced broadcast, but most news channels in the usa is very one sided. Link tv shows other views, BBC the same
2007-02-11 08:15:02 · answer #2 · answered by onlinedreamer 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just like Al-Jazeera, The New York Times and CNN=crap eh.
2007-02-11 08:32:35 · answer #3 · answered by Cat'sPJs 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Do i've got faith i'm lied to returned? confident, yet that would not recommend that i'm unlikely to help him. appropriate or incorrect he's doing what he thinks is maximum suitable for the individuals of the u . s .. some human beings would have faith that he has used the militia to plenty interior the international warfare against Islam yet i've got faith has no longer used it sufficient. we are struggling with a warfare with one arm tied at the back of our backs via fact we are following the regulations of engagement against an enemy that's no longer abiding via a similar regulations. So if he lies to make human beings think of that he's attempting to sparkling up it diplomatically, mutually as the u . s . Air rigidity is simulating air strikes against bunkered centers interior the Nevada dessert then effective via me.
2016-11-03 04:20:37 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Fox was never credible in the first place. This was the network that twice identified Mark Foley as a Democrat.
2007-02-11 08:12:31 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
There never has been credibility with Faux News, and anyone with half a brain can see it. That is why when their viewers are polled about WMDs in Iraq the majority of them believe they were found there. Misinformation much?
2007-02-11 08:11:37 · answer #6 · answered by ♥austingirl♥ 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
What about Clinton?
What if it turns out Bushed used Bill Cinton's intelligence to go to war with Iraq?
Let's remember 1998, when the Clinton Administration had town hall meetings about why we should attack Iraq. What intelligence did he use? And what if Bush took the same intel and acted on it.
2007-02-11 08:13:10 · answer #7 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
FAUX Noise Channel never had any credibility so they can't lose any credibility,,at least not among the intelligent folks who never trusted FOX to be a News source,,rather considered it biased right wing entertainment.
2007-02-11 08:11:02 · answer #8 · answered by JS 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋
I guess it really sucks when a news show comes along and actually makes you have to think for yourself.
2007-02-11 08:35:34 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't know about the rest of you, but if I had wings at all, I'm sure I'd be quite happy with a left one AND a right one...
...but that's just me...
2007-02-11 08:13:55 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋