How can I compare The Pax Romana to The Golden Age of Athens?

Question

Please help

Answer 1

This is quite a serious consideration. I just make a couple of points.
1. Both Areas were in the same part of the World with the Mediterranean availabe for transport.
2. Both empires prized and built upon Greek Culture, Philosophy, Architechture etc. Rome expended Greek Architechture immensly.
3. Both used th Greek language at some point in time.
4. Both Greeks and Romans attempted to conquer to world.

Hope this helps.
I Cr 13;8a

Answer 2

Dont be confused by previous answers.

@the above: What ur talking about is not the Golden Age of Athens, its the Alexandrian period (translated from Greek).

Anyway:
The basic difference is about politics.
Its sort of monarchy vs democracy. Golden Age is what we really refer to as "age of democracy", eg. rhetorics developed by famous Perikles and others.
To understand the differnces in this field compare:
A.who could be elected?
Rome-rich, noble
Athens-every

In both cases men.

B.how did this affected ppl?
Rome-afraid, joined the army to make money - the word salary is because that time Romans were paid in salt which was quite important.
Athens-freedom, joined arts - developed theater, poetry etc.

C. Of course region. Pax Romana was rreeeeeeaaally big (3 continents), while Athens was only one city. Actually this shaped the political status in both:
Rome had to make wars to keep people together.
Athens was so tiny it could define democracy. Democracy is better among a few :)

D.What about social life?
Rome-Many ppl from different rregions.
Athens-Natives mostly.

Women were not important. Though in Rome they were slightly better, selling things on the street.

This can go far, basically the idea is:
Pax Romana - Biiiiiig with many different ppl - empire = wars
Athens - Small, different opinions *could* be heard = democracy

One final thing, they were both destroyed finally by wars:
Rome conquered by external enemy - Goths - and then was separated into West and East - Rome and Byzantium.
Golden Age finished because of Athens-vs-Peloponnesus war which also meant the death of Pericles of desease the final years of the war. Then finally all Greek cities were conquered by Philippus.

Answer 3

Although the answer cannot be given in a short memo as this place requires, I must respond and refute the previous answer.
The Greeks did not attempt to conquer the world. Alexander the Great was more of an explorer than a conqueror and he came at the very end of the Greek Age.
Also Expanded and Expended are two different words. Careful..
Greece was never an Empire. It was composed of city-states that had common language and faith.

Answer 4

it quite is an exceptionally lengthy and sophisticated subject to respond to in a short area. i'd analyze it from this attitude: The later Grecian lifestyle became depending upon practise and philosophy. even as the Greeks were warlike of their previously civilizations, they became extra civil of their politics after many conquests. The Greeks tended to count extra on practise. Pax Romana became depending extra upon conquering a u . s ., area, or territory, then organising an section authorities that became obedient to Rome. less than Pax Romana, there remained sufficient garrisons of armed troops to placed down localized rebellions.