Or has Bush's past "intelligence failures" ruined his credibility with you?
2007-02-11 05:56:01 · 15 answers · asked by Longhaired Freaky Person 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
of course, Bush appoints the leaders of the military, and if they don't agree with him, he gets rid of them. So there is no difference between what Bush says and what the military says.
2007-02-11 06:10:39 · update #1
At this point, George could tell me that water was wet and I wouldn't believe it.
2007-02-11 06:02:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Given the current mood between American and Iran, absolutely. Do I believe they're the only ones, NO.
2007-02-12 04:21:48 · answer #2 · answered by Michael E 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Actually this was reported by the new Commander over their and I believe his words were something along the lines of "we think we have evidence that Iran has supplied some fuse and bombmaking parts found in Iraq".
2007-02-11 06:04:00 · answer #3 · answered by meathookcook 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Well since the military located in Iraq has found the evidence yes it is very believable.
2007-02-11 06:05:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
OF COURSE THEY ARE!!!!
It was an assumption they would!!!
What is the matter with many Americans .........all of this was always the goal of going to war in Iraq!!!!!!!!!
They are calling the Iranians out to wage war against Iran.......that was the PLAN!!!!!!
They won't be satisfied until the Middle East is compliant with their agenda there!!!!!!
If they have to wage war to accomplish this agenda that's what Bush & Co. is willing to do!!!!!!!!!
These people we keep letting assume government positions are OIL people and heads of companies that make HUGE sums of money with contracts to the military!!!!
When someone is addicted to money you don't put them in charge of it!!!!!
It would be like putting someone who's an alcoholic in charge of a liquor company!!!!
How is that not clear?????
2007-02-11 06:11:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
Yes, Iran backs lots of groups in the middle east that us terror style violence against enemies. This is the modern method of going to war.
2007-02-11 07:28:04 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Credibility? Where ? Nothing Bush can say makes a difference to me.
2007-02-11 06:06:35 · answer #7 · answered by planksheer 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
It is probably true but I find myself not really caring. After all, there is a foreign military occupying their neighbor and which has made thinly veiled threats towards them (Iran).
2007-02-11 06:02:12 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Given Bush's track record, no.
2007-02-11 06:01:45 · answer #9 · answered by Reno M 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
It's not Bushes claim,its the claim of our military personnel who are being killed with the weapons..,darrrrrr
2007-02-11 06:00:41 · answer #10 · answered by jnwmom 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋