short too....about 5'6". not true. she tall.
2007-02-11 05:33:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by ihatea c 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes, its true. I drove the bigger H2 and I did not have any head room. The back seats were worst. It was an uncomfortable and very slow ride. It is also hard to see the traffic lights because the roof goes far ahead of your face blocking the lights. It gets 9-14 mpg. People only like them because a famous person bought one, then all the famous people got one. Thats why people think they are cool.
2007-02-12 20:46:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by C7S 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is nothing but a Chevy Tahoe with a different body , I did not like the h2 and I hate the h3 they are just for show ,and are over rated off road , if you do not plan on going off road and playing in the mud why waste the money to buy one , after all they are made for off road , if you want something to look pretty in try a new dress as far as a on the road just cruising they SUCK they are not made for that they are made for suckers who think they look cool driving a Chevy in disguise....or they are compensating for other "short commings"
2007-02-11 13:38:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by Insensitively Honest 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
The Hummer H3 is too small for my liking.
In fact, I liken it to the "Lady Canyonero" from the Simpsons.
The H3, basically, is for rich, spoiled girls and any man who drives it will be exterminated upon his red-light stop.
2007-02-11 13:36:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by Toilet 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
No it is the same thing basically as a Chevy canyon, same motor and transmission
2007-02-13 20:23:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Sit in back of a trailblazer its the same thing.
2007-02-11 13:36:51
·
answer #6
·
answered by cannondale96 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
thats BS
2007-02-11 13:33:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by codetalkrz 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
no head room at all and gas guzzler..
2007-02-11 13:33:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by Irie 123 3
·
0⤊
1⤋