2007-02-11 05:09:44 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
My intelligence tells me not to.
2007-02-11 05:19:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
I definitely believe the intelligence on Iran because I still believe that the intelligence on Iraq was correct. Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and they were moved into Syria before the war began. These WMD are still on Syrian soil. Why we don't go after the weapons is beyond me. Why the US government doesn't admit that they are there is purely political. The US doesn't need another Arab country as an immediate enemy at this time.
2007-02-12 07:20:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes if it makes sense, for example we know as much as you can know anything that war by poxy is all over the world. Every government who can and needs oil is sending cash and or guns to Iraq. All I would ask for is the intelligence comunity to list all the donors so we can go to war with all parties. I can promise you that Saudi Arabia is on that list so it will never come out and we will be left with Iran is the only cause of instability in Iraq.
2007-02-11 13:45:43 · answer #3 · answered by Prophet of Zero Gods 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. These duplicitous bastards will say absolutely anything with a straight face to further their geopolitical agenda, their judgement has been demonstrably poor, andthey show no signs of having reconsidered any of it.
But it doesn't really matter anyway. Iran has more right to be involved in Iraq's affairs than we do, being neighbors and all, as we would have the right to fund Canadian resistance if they were invaded by the Chinese.
2007-02-11 13:29:55 · answer #4 · answered by oimwoomwio 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
All the intelligence on Iraq wasn't wrong, although the people who only get thier news from CNN,ABC, CBS, and NBC probably think so.
2007-02-11 16:39:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
At this point, I don't believe anything the White House or the Pentagon says. The only time they are NOT lying is when their mouths are shut. I don't even listen to them anymore. I am just counting the days until the Crawford Weed and his cronies crawl back under the rock they crawled out from......
2007-02-11 17:25:58 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No.
The military is already falsifying "intelligence" on Iran just like they did to justify the Iraq war.
There is no doubt in my mind that Bush intends to attack Iran - and it will be a HUGE mistake.
2007-02-11 13:13:44 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Im guessing youre completely unfamiliar with the staff changes in national security and intelligence, why dont you check that out before you come here and try to scoop up the rubes.
2007-02-11 13:24:06 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
If the intelligence was wrong, why didn't Sadaam let the inspectors do their job? He had the last opportunity to stop the war. The answer is obvious to me.
2007-02-11 13:25:28 · answer #9 · answered by americanmalearlington 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
yes, because there is now an "overkill" on gathering accurate intelligence to shut up the peacenik whiners.
2007-02-11 14:59:30 · answer #10 · answered by Mon-chu' 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋