They were not even a threat to the USA!!!
Maybe to Exxon and Israel
2007-02-11 05:01:46 · 22 answers · asked by Taco . 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
ExxonMobil will gladly foot the bill, as long as the contracts are lucrative.
2007-02-11 05:09:04 · answer #1 · answered by Jackson Leslie 5 · 2⤊ 5⤋
Maybe it's not always because they are a threat to the U.S., Saddam was a threat to his own people, and winning democracy in Iraq would profit America by having them as an Allie in the war on Terror. The war isn't fake, but we aren't fighting against Iraq, we are fighting for Iraq, and training their military and law enforcement to defend their country independently. We are helping them fight against the insurgents, the terrorist that enter Iraq.
2007-02-11 05:10:07 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Since it was only 4 guards a rope and a disposable cellphone. The cost was minimal
The entree for the average Senators lunch cost more than Saddams Lynching.
Go big Red Go
2007-02-11 05:09:32 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
The Iraqi court that tried, sentenced and hanged Saddam. Exxon and Israel was not even involved with the trial.
2007-02-11 05:05:31 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 2⤋
Saddam was only arrested by our troops. His own government judges condemmed him to hang. Why are you so worried about Saddam? If you care so much, go live in Iraq.
2007-02-11 05:10:21 · answer #5 · answered by chole_24 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
What makes you think it is fake? Oh let me guess--the planes flying into the twin towers was a conspiracy too, right?
Hitler wasn't a threat to the US and we caused his demise. Should we pay for that too?
Milosevic wasn't a threat to the US. Should we pay for Yugoslavia?
Who exactly are we supposed to pay?
2007-02-11 05:09:49 · answer #6 · answered by Fearless Leader 4 · 6⤊ 0⤋
One thing you have to understand. The USA did not completely screw up everything. They made sure the trial was (supposedly) by the people. This way our government could not get the blame. We all know we had a very big hand in it all by influence. I think we should concentrate on something we might be able to pull off. like have a long list of those to be charged with war crimes.
2007-02-11 05:17:47 · answer #7 · answered by letfreedomring 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Just where do you buy your drugs? Toco box by the bay in sunny TJ?
Fake war with fake people getting killed by fake suicide bombers! What a stoner comment!
Oh well even the NAZI party is allowed free speech to support Saddam and his kids!
So be welcome in your crazy NAZI mindset!
2007-02-11 05:12:21 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
With their rape and torture rooms they were a threat to all Iraqis. But that doesn't matter to liberals, Iraqi citizens cannot vote in the USA.
2007-02-11 05:10:15 · answer #9 · answered by Bawney 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
fake? LOL
there's a new one.
Clinton said back in '98 that so long as Saddam was in power, he was a threat to the entire world. i believed him. did he change his mind since?
2007-02-11 05:05:21 · answer #10 · answered by political junkie 4 · 7⤊ 2⤋
The war is not fake and no one needs to "pay" for executing murderers.
2007-02-11 05:14:34 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋