2007-02-11 04:46:19 · 8 answers · asked by BuggerOff 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
100 on the scale of ignorance
2007-02-11 07:53:34 · answer #1 · answered by Mon-chu' 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Liberals:+65
Republicnazis:-1000
2007-02-11 13:44:47 · answer #2 · answered by Zapatta McFrench 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What does that mean? Who are "liberals"?
The ACLU? 85.
Barney Frank? 12
Tom Vilsack? 80.
Al gore? 65
Obama? 89.
Tim Robbins? 42
Ralph Nader? 35.
Hillary Clinton? 75.
AFL/CIO? 40
Al Sharpton? 6.
Pelosi? 72.
Reid? 62.
Greenpeace? 52.
Howard Dean? 69.
Union of Concerned Scientists? 78.
How can you bunch a whole universe of different political ideologies, personalities, and priorities into one word "liberals." At least "neo-con" stood for a particular subclass of conservatives that all had the same relative point of view and goals. But "liberals" means nothing today. It doesn't even mean "democrat," which you could say would at least unite those people under the Democratic Party platform...
2007-02-11 12:54:44 · answer #3 · answered by Perdendosi 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
18
2007-02-11 12:49:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
If 100 being the best I would rate them 100.
2007-02-11 12:49:46 · answer #5 · answered by jodya22289 1 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I would say about a 6.
2007-02-11 12:51:57 · answer #6 · answered by chole_24 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
9, in many cases.
2007-02-11 12:50:08 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
conservatives-5
liberals-15
2007-02-11 12:50:31 · answer #8 · answered by socialist sympathiser 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋