English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Look at this article;
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070211/ts_nm/iraq_dc
Now their claiming that Iran has it's hand in Iraq. Utter nonsense. The only thing the Bush admin has learned through this debacle is how to fake evidence in order to persuade the gullible sheep.
It did'nt work when they lied about WMD's, and it won't work now.

2007-02-11 03:51:12 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Current Events

14 answers

The question shouldn’t be to know whether the Bush Administration is lying again or not. You, American, should first ASK YOURSELVES why you have believed them so easily four years ago, when it was already obvious that they were lying about the WMD.

2007-02-11 04:56:22 · answer #1 · answered by marco 1 · 1 3

Loads of Fox News hypnotized losers do. These people do not need proof, they are automatons. And now Bush has replaced all the non-compliant generals so they can parrot the lies Bush and Cheney have been spreading.

As the article points out WE were the catalyst for letting Iran into Iraq


They are pulling the same trick again just four years after the original one and it is seriously being discussed and reported on..

what a brainwashed nation!!


PS: So what even if Iran were in Iraq. They are next door. We certainly are interfering there from half way across the world!!! What makes America better than Iran?

2007-02-11 03:59:40 · answer #2 · answered by TheMetallian 3 · 2 3

28% or so of people help Bush, an amazingly severe decision, pondering......... P.S. i want regardless of medication Wolf is utilising. Oh yeah, Clinton went through "impeachment" hearings, that grow to be the republican's dropping time and money attempting to deliver a democratic prsident down for in uncomplicated words political causes, in the intervening time bin weighted down grow to be making his plans and 1000's of FBI brokers were sorting out bill's love existence. shall we see, bill grow to be getting off in the oval workplace, hairy Boy has killed 1000's of 1000's of persons and grew to grow to be u . s . of america right into a u . s . without production, yeah Clinton grow to be a lot more beneficial dishonest. anybody who believes that you'll evaluate both is an fool.

2016-12-04 01:11:26 · answer #3 · answered by barby 3 · 0 0

Yes, look beyond your little microcosm. You'll see that people outside of your terrarium of friends and idols understand the facts. Reuters even wrote the article, and you don't get it. Reuters is liberal journalism. Yahoo is liberal. . .

Here's another article to read directly from the General's mouth, written by the AP, very liberal too.

U.S. military: Iran arming Iraq militias
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070211/ap_on_re_mi_ea/iraq;_ylt=AmFseRYyFFB3c9hOhlj5z_tg.3QA

So what would it take for you to open your mind to other possibilities? The people you call sheep are avidly reading the facts from many sources. You apparently stick to your flock. Look at a mirror first instead of knee jerk labeling other people names that adhere best to you.

2007-02-11 09:33:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

The Bush Administration is not reporting the Iran/Iraq thing, it is coming from the Military. However, I do not believe much that is coming out of the Bush Administration and will be happy to see it go.

2007-02-11 04:00:32 · answer #5 · answered by redhotboxsoxfan 6 · 1 2

Regardless of what anyone says, Bush is an honest man with a good heart. He truly wanted to bring democracy to the ME. He urged the UN to fulfill their duty to enforce the blatant snubbing of a multitude of UN resolutions against Iraq.
He did not ask for 9/11 to occur on his watch. What would you expect any president to do?
True, Iraq is indeed a mess, and no president will be able to unravel the damage being done. The major failure of this administration was to have the ear of the wrong people in the beginning. Plus not only this administration, but this government as a whole does not understand the ME way of thinking.
I do blame our government for arrogance on occasion. But don't think there were ulterior motives from the start.

2007-02-11 04:53:52 · answer #6 · answered by thankamy 3 · 2 4

If you don't like America, or it's leaders, and you say you don't trust them, why don't you get on a plane and travel over here and see for yourself how these people live. You would be ashamed of yourself. To have a leader of a country to govern his people with fear instead of trying to make them and there country better. He should have been tortured to death like he did of so many of his own people and others. Another armchair quarterback sitting in the comfort of your cozy home while Great Men and Women are fighting for your right to ask stupid questions.

2007-02-11 09:36:34 · answer #7 · answered by John W 2 · 1 1

Uh, it DID work when they lied about WMD's -- most Americans believed it (not this one, but a strong majority).

It's likely (though I haven't seen any polling on the topic) that fewer people will believe them now.

As Bush himself said "Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, uh, we'll, uh, don't get fooled again."

;-)

2007-02-11 09:20:03 · answer #8 · answered by tehabwa 7 · 1 1

I have never believed him..which is why I didn't vote for him. I'm a pretty good judge of character. I cannot see any good thing he has done for the American people. Nothing. Now he wants more money and more troops for what?!! Bull.

I'm obviously not a fan of his.

2007-02-11 04:01:20 · answer #9 · answered by auntcookie84 6 · 3 2

Bush lies so much He has become the "Scum in the bottom of a Douche Bag"

2007-02-11 04:28:07 · answer #10 · answered by bodie 3 · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers