If it's proven, it affects more than just U.S. interests. Our Allies should be brought in on this and we should present a united front to Tehran, first through a united warning, then through united military action if necessary. I stress bringing our Allies in on this because military action against Iran will result in terrorist problems all over the globe, not just for us. It is time to stop being cowboys and start attending to building a worldwide front against terrorism that includes serious input from all Allies and any other nations threatened by these people. If the free people of the world wish to keep their freedom, then we have to unite to fight terrorism. Right now we merge our intelligence with Britain's and Israel's and hope for the best. What we really should be doing is setting up a REAL Allied front against it with REAL teeth from more countries than just our own. WWII wasn't won simply because we entered the fight. It took a great deal of serious collaboration between our Allied nations. Why can't we come together again in strength and purpose to defeat terrorism?
2007-02-11 04:43:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
If we degree each and all the international places you have mentioned, then the U. S. is the biggest risk, as long because it meddles in different international places' corporation. yet please God, would Ron Paul replace into US president, and then the U. S. would be a peacefull usa. yet now, I additionally don't comprehend why Israel desires the approval of the U. S. if it incredibly feels it has to attack Iran. I recommend, if Israel incredibly feels threatened via Iran, then i do no longer see the think approximately asking another state, surprisingly a state the place Pollard is jailed, approximately climate Israel is threatened or no longer. Or if Israel would not sense threatened via Iran, then why does Israel play those video games?! And that is composed of yet another point of a risk to worldwide peace: the combination of the U. S., Israel and Iran (however that mixture have been fairly weakened via Goldstone's report on Israel's cutting-edge conflict over the Gaza Strip). so some distance as I undergo in strategies from the information, Goldstone threatened Gen. Djukic & Colonel Krsmanovic (as defined interior the source I convey) with extradition to the two Islamic Bosnia or Iran. So Iranian prisons play a place in being a risk to those the U. S. government do in contrast to, and that's mixed with the Israeli media preaching hate (it fairly is likewise a certainty i will no longer be able to be sure how everyone can dispute).
2016-11-03 03:45:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would have to consider the source of the information which is probably the same source that said Iraq was an imminent threat because it had WMD. Now if you think the USA should expand as an empire you would probably believe it no matter what and any one that doesn't believe USA should be an empire should be called anti-patriotic or anti-American. Most Americans don't want to create an empire, but the people on power want to increase spending for obvious reasons and expand as an empire. To do it they appeal to your pride and patriotism by fabricating information that would spark those feelings. As long as you feel that way they can spend all the money the want.
So the issue is not pulling from Iraq or invading Iran, the issue is do you want America to become an empire or not? And are we getting fabricated information or not?
2007-02-11 04:25:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by Jose R 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
It is proven that Pakistan is supporting terrorism in India. What is wrong with it if Iran is doing same in Iraq? UN should work indipendently, no pressure at all. Come & watch Kashmir, what about that? Terrorism is not the way to solve the issues. If it is proven that Iran is supplying weapons to terrorists in Iraq then the solution is to find out the basic problem but not attacking the country. All Iranis are not supporting the terrorism. We Indians are thinking in the same way, otherwise Pakistan..............just few hours game for INDIAN ARMY.
2007-02-11 04:58:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by ishwer 1
·
4⤊
0⤋
I say ignore it. All the world is currently supplying Iraqi factions with cash and weapons. To say that only Iran is doing this is being largely ignorant of how the world works. Somolia with its meager oil fields gets guns from all over the world so it stands to reason that a large resource country like Iraq is going to get tons of guns from everywhere. I think this civil war will go on for a very long time unless some of the stronger measures Saddam used are employed. In a way you can see this Civil war being good for america with all the factions fighting when are they going to train to come over here and bomb us?
2007-02-11 04:24:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Invading Iran would make an already bad situation worse!..We are already over stretch with Afghanistan and IRAQ.. to do so will require other nations to join and as you know most of our allies have plans to withdraw from Iraq.. We should not be surprise that this is happening as it has been predicted by a great many..lets not put any more fuel on the fire and try diplomacy !
2007-02-11 04:04:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by dadacoolone 5
·
5⤊
0⤋
Once again, George Bush is creating the enemy, and once again, people are falling for the same old song. The FACT is that most of Iran is Shiite, and the violence [can we say civil war yet] in Iraq is being perpetrated by Sunni's. The response is, first to make the factions in Iraq sit down and share the wealth, and then bring all the countries of the region to confer in their own destiny.
2007-02-11 05:30:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Iran is falling apart at the seems and this is an attempt to rally the masses. Seal the borders and Blast everything that moves in. The Students and general population of Iran are pretty tired of this wacko government in Tehran.
2007-02-11 04:01:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Terrorists in Iraq...where? Yout Taliban/Al Queda members are in Afghanistan, Pakistan, etc. The individuals in Iraq are busy making civil war on each other, and the occasional run-in with coalition forces. I guess you might want to label them as terrorists, but they see themselves as freedom fighters... just like every other country that's fought against occupation, including our own.
2007-02-11 03:55:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by woobinator 2
·
5⤊
0⤋
Pull the troops out of Baghdad and seal the borders with Iran, and Syria. Let the Iraqi fight their own battles without interference from foreign country's
2007-02-11 03:52:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋