I hate the idea of conflict diamonds... but if they're more affordable...who sells them?

Question

I hate saying it, but I can't afford they prices I see in the mall. I don't want to support conflict diamonds, I saw the movie...felt horrible... but everything I see that is conflict free...I can't afford :(
any suggestions?

Answer 1

"Cheap" blood diamonds will not filter down to you. Diamond wholesalers in South Africa and Europe (most notably Belgium) suck up these diamonds and thereby the make the most profit. Consumers like yourself will always pay the same price.

Answer 2

I agree with the above poster buy cubic zirconia or select a less than perfect diamond you can get discounted 'flawed' diamonds or go for a lessor clarity you really cannot tell the difference.

Another way to phrase your question "how many people should I support having killed so I can save money?"
and by the way when the military steps in the taxpayers (thats you) foot the bill so you pay some where.
Sweet dreams

Answer 3

I agree with the above posters. Your conscience is right. Try something "less perfect" - you will feel 1000 times better about it. Think about it this way - if you stole the perfect diamond, your guilt would probably make you appreciate it less than if you bought something conflict-free or even cubic.

Answer 4

ought to that's the self-referencing (or recursive) characteristic it quite is tense. maximum recommendations are about innovations. maximum innovations are about practise of gadgets. yet what about a idea of authentic innovations? what's that about? actuality? Is there any large difference between holding "expertise" and holding "authentic expertise"? does not all expertise be authentic expertise? if so, the conception of expertise is redundant, as well as recursive (self-referencing). this kind of concept creates confusions that do not prefer to be there. for this reason it really is hateful. QED. that's yet another chance to take a run at this abstruse yet problematic question. that's an same reason that Eskimos hate the conception of snow. For them there are 15 diverse words for snow, so in basic terms holding "snow" is a huge over-generalization, and that's actually stressful and meaningless. Plato said 4 kinds of expertise (this may be like the Eskimo with the numerous snow words). there is pistis that is sensory expertise, then there is calculation, i visit't remember the Greek be conscious for that, although that's like mathematics and trigonometry and geometry, etc. Then there is dianoia which seeing via issues to their center -- by technique of dianoia we carry close summary innovations, like table, or chair, or tree, or dogs. finally, there episteme that is expertise of the utmost kinds like the best, The in basic terms, the interest-catching, the spectacular. i have not re-examine the Republic in diverse years, so i'm not certain i have were given those precisely acceptable, yet my element is that there are a kind of kinds of expertise for a logician, and attempting to %. all of them right into a unmarried concept and in basic terms say "expertise" is a fallacy. The fallacy of falsely compounding many stuff into one be conscious as if that be conscious utilized interior of an same thanks to all of them. The fallacy of pretend conflating. pretend conflating is a kind of mistakes, subsequently the unitary concept of expertise is an mistakes, it really is deceptive speech which takes us faraway from expertise, subsequently it really is hateful. QED. i visit placed 1/2 my chips on my first answer, and 1/2 on my 2d answer, type of like on the roulette table, the position you play 2 numbers by technique of putting your chips on the line between them. i ought to get some small winnings that way 18 to at least a million (vs 36 ro a million).

Answer 5

Buy cubic zirconia if you can't afford "clean" diamonds. Nobody except an expert can tell the difference.

(PS: You DO realise, don't you, that diamonds are just carbon, i.e. polished lumps of coal?)!