When the burnt corpse of Hitler's wife Eva Braun Hitler was found outside the bunker at the end of World War..

Question

II in Europe, the Russians brought the corpse back to the Kremlin and performed an autopsy on it. The medical examiner reported that the corpse was pregnant with a fetus. How could this be possible. Adolf Hitler was born with only one testicle and was not able to impregnate women. Nazi propaganda told the German people Hitler lost it from a wound he aquired in WW I.

The above information is from an episode of a show I watched on the History Channel. If it is all true, how do you think Eva Braun got pregnant? History buffs, let loose on this one!

After some thought, I may be able to answer my own question. Eva Braun was probably artificially inseminated by a speices of the "master race", which was common in Nazi Germany. If the war would have continued and she would have given birth, Nazi Propaganda would have insisted the child was Hitler's. His friend Herman Goering did the same thing with his younger wife.

I am not being gullable but merely going on fact based accounts from witnesses that knew Hitler. The web that the top answerer provided fits the name, "The Straight Dope". This is just one man's opinion from thing he's heard on the street and nothing more.

Answer 1

this is all absolute rubbish.

Firstly males with one testicle can impregnate women
Secondly Hitler had both testicles
Thirdly the bodies where burnt beyond all recognition and no no autopsy was possible
Fourth Do you really think the KGB is a reliable source

The gut above is right, visit the link he provides, read a book and stop being so gullible

Answer 2

Whether there is any truth in Hitler having just the one nut is a matter of some conjecture, as there are conflicting reports either verifying it or denying it (see link 1).

It is only the Russian autopsy that we have as "proof" that Eva was pregnant although, admittedly there were rumours in the bunker that she was pregnant. The Russian information is suspect in the extreme - indeed it wasn't until 1950 that the official Russian line was that Hitler was dead. Until that time, Stalin maintained that Hitler had escaped.

There is also no evidence at all that Eva was remotely promiscuous, unlike her sister Gretl.

So - lets make several leaps of faith.

Say Eva was pregnant and Hitler was testicularly-challenged. Why should the child not be his? Just because he may have been only half the man most of us are would not have prevented him from being fertile.

I think The History Channel are guilty of throwing together a few rumours and conjecture and forming a documentary out of it.

******************************************************************

..............and, my friend, you are guilty of propagating conjecture. Throw just one "probably" into a history and it is no longer history. The entire concept of "histories" like "The Holy Blood and The Holy Grail" and von Daniken's ancient astronauts are built on probablys rather than facts.

****************************************************************

Hold on my friend - you can't have it all ways. You've asked us to discuss a premise put forward by a programme on "The History Channel". Just because its on the TV doesn't mean that the sources are any better than those that I've provided on my link. You've criticised this link as being "one man's opinion" - well, what do you think "The History Channel" programme is ? The opinion, however, is based on FACTS, the premise of "The History Channel" is based on rumour, conjecture and unreliable sources. There is simply no proof for any of the major parts of your argument (ie. that Hitler was born without one ball, that Eva was pregnant) and, as for your conclusion that she was inseminated by a "species of the master race", where does that come from and what proof do you have for that ?

Answer 3

Repentance is something that we could do in this existence and hitler would not be waiting to repent of all his murderous and grievous sins - that's impossible. he's previous desire. Repenting demands us to repair that which we TOOK or harmed in yet another - you notice the subject now? : (