English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

8 answers

Negative, and bear in mind that the D party has been seized by commie rat scumbags, thus only very few patriotic Dems exist within the party...

2007-02-11 02:21:06 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I don't think is that big of a deal! Dont we have just as many Republicans running for office?? and remember we had a whole lot more Dems running for the nomination for 2004 elections.Positive or negative? neutral!

2007-02-11 10:17:44 · answer #2 · answered by boricua_lilly 3 · 0 0

I think it's a good thing. We are already so limited in choices when it comes to election day. At least there are a number of people with a number of different ideas that the Dems. get to choose from.

2007-02-11 10:16:07 · answer #3 · answered by smellyfoot ™ 7 · 0 0

It is good to have more choices.

The problem right now is that most are focusing on the top three candidates -- Hillary, Barack, and Edwards -- and not giving the others a second look.

2007-02-11 10:22:35 · answer #4 · answered by kyuzo777 2 · 0 0

It will be a positive for the country. Think of the thousands of laws they will not be able to submit since they will be out kissing all the babies.

2007-02-11 19:25:57 · answer #5 · answered by clwkcmo 5 · 0 0

I see it as a positive because it gives more choices for those Republican voters who don't want to vote Republican in the next election.

2007-02-11 10:16:15 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

probably negative but what a circus we will see

2007-02-14 20:14:33 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't know, but I will have fun watching!!!!

2007-02-11 11:47:03 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers