Negative, and bear in mind that the D party has been seized by commie rat scumbags, thus only very few patriotic Dems exist within the party...
2007-02-11 02:21:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
I don't think is that big of a deal! Dont we have just as many Republicans running for office?? and remember we had a whole lot more Dems running for the nomination for 2004 elections.Positive or negative? neutral!
2007-02-11 10:17:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by boricua_lilly 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think it's a good thing. We are already so limited in choices when it comes to election day. At least there are a number of people with a number of different ideas that the Dems. get to choose from.
2007-02-11 10:16:07
·
answer #3
·
answered by smellyfoot ™ 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is good to have more choices.
The problem right now is that most are focusing on the top three candidates -- Hillary, Barack, and Edwards -- and not giving the others a second look.
2007-02-11 10:22:35
·
answer #4
·
answered by kyuzo777 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
It will be a positive for the country. Think of the thousands of laws they will not be able to submit since they will be out kissing all the babies.
2007-02-11 19:25:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by clwkcmo 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I see it as a positive because it gives more choices for those Republican voters who don't want to vote Republican in the next election.
2007-02-11 10:16:15
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
probably negative but what a circus we will see
2007-02-14 20:14:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know, but I will have fun watching!!!!
2007-02-11 11:47:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋