Well she did have a hand in some to the records. I suppose so!
2007-02-11 00:44:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by Celeste P 7
·
4⤊
3⤋
a lot of this is the result of the bad behavior of other people
(something that nobody except the person who did it is responsble for)
some of it is the result of an over-zealous prosecution based upon personal animosity. ( this is something anyone would be unfairly treated by no matter what their personal behavior was)
Ken Starr is a disgrace to his profession for abusing his power so much.
Some of it is just silly crap that no genuine person cares about such as sexual peccadillos. Again the over-prosecution explains this rather than the degree of fault. most Presidents and almost anybody engages in these acts fom time to time and usually the public politly ignores it.
Many of the people who tried to use him or whatever were instigated to do so by his enemies
Every politican takes what amounts to be "illegal" campaign contributions even today. it is the problem with an unrealistic law.
The only thing he was impeached for was lying to protect the honor of a lady, as most southern gentlement would do. It was extremely rude to put him under oath and then ask such inappropriate prying irrelevant questions. No president could pass that test, even the precious Geore Bush. I would love to see him put under oath and grilled about past things he may or may not have done. He would never agree to do it. he would take the fifth ( and probably think he was going to get a bottle of booze)
Lucky for him there is no IQ test to be eligible to run for president.
2007-02-11 08:57:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
Hillary Rodhamhurst Clinton has a questionable record going all they way back to the Rose Law Firm. The Clinton's are part Bushco so if she is selected we will have 24 years of Clinton's and Bush's. She will not represent America any better than the boarder line retard in the oval office now.
2007-02-11 09:05:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by anya_mystica 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think it would be pretty clean, except for what she has done in the last 8 years.
Everyone involved in the Clintons personel and business affairs prior to that has either been killed or pardoned.
2007-02-11 08:52:10
·
answer #4
·
answered by snowball45830 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Most likely yes.
All Sicko wanted was a warm wet willing young girl.
Hillary was responsible for the shame and disgrace of their administration.
2007-02-11 09:13:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
A better bet is whether Chillary will have a "Howard Dean" moment where she completely melts down in front of the country.
2007-02-11 08:44:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
3⤋
She already is on her way and that'll be a YES to the question!!
2007-02-11 08:48:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by Vagabond5879 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
She could possibly do that. It will not be pretty I can assure you.
2007-02-11 08:45:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Hmm, shrooms and yahoo.... I'm gonna have to give that a try!
2007-02-11 08:44:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by na n 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
I bet she wouldn't commit as many war crimes as GWB.
2007-02-11 08:45:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋