I just read a news article that a judge denied the dna test postponing it until February 20 (can't remember exact date) It would seem that it would be in everyone's best interest, particularly the baby to have this resolved asap!
2007-02-11 00:36:45 · 5 answers · asked by ginger 4 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
I am of course referring to the paternity of her baby girl.
2007-02-11 00:39:09 · update #1
The judge denied DNA testing on ANNA NICOLE, not the men vying to be the Daddy. Some of the lawyers wanted to have a baseline DNA from Anna Nicole so that the baby couldn't be switched to try to throw off the paternity. The judge didn't see any reason to do any kind of emergency testing on Anna Nicole so he postponed it until February 20. It had nothing to do with the potential daddy DNA.
2007-02-11 02:56:40 · answer #1 · answered by x 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
there has been a DNA attempt ordered for the child. the most modern issue in the courts appropriate to the DNA grow to be a request for Anna Nicole to be DNA examined, with the reasoning being conserving the integrity of a paternity attempt (i.e. switching Danillelyn with yet another infant.) That has no longer been ordered or denied, the decide has requested 10 days to study the situations.
2016-12-04 01:05:09 · answer #2 · answered by huehn 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it was set at that date before she died ....they were wanting to up it and he said no......alot of people say that was one of the reasons she killed herself????? i dont know though??? i heard the baby girl is sitting on half a billion dollars though ....wow talk about being born with a platinum spoon in your mouth ...lol
2007-02-11 00:45:42 · answer #3 · answered by Christina 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
...and why would they IMMEDIATELY test the secret compartment of Michael Vick's water bottle to see if it contained marijuana?(Florida authorities said it WASN'T pot, but they wouldn't say what it WAS!)
2007-02-11 00:48:48 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
WANTS PUBLICITY, DRAG THE WHOLE THING TO MAKE HIMSELF FAMOUS.
2007-02-11 00:47:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋