No. It tends to promote a highly erotic state without any specific gender preference. Generic gray avatars also usually cause extreme elation, bizarre food cravings and a sudden need to remove one's clothing.
2007-02-11 02:02:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by DawnDavenport 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I posted a question about that too...I don't think it promotes homosexuality, (but funny that you would see it that way...I guess you must be gay then...I never would have looked it with that logic) I think it's male stereotyping, and whoever selected that did it as a slight to women or perhaps you are right and they are gay and trying to make a statement to the world as always.
Most people are not discernative enough to know if a respondent is male or female, which results in stupid replies at times.
2007-02-11 08:25:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think you may have too much thought for the amount of brain power you can muster.
Other than that, perhaps Yahoo should make a less androgynous avatar.
2007-02-11 08:29:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by wolf n dolphin beals 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
it is mostly toward woman since the gray avatar looks like a man whenever someone has it i automatically think a guy posted it
2007-02-11 08:24:37
·
answer #4
·
answered by Grammar B*@%h 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Sweetie, you've spent way to much time thinking about it. Go and make a cup of tea and maybe have a nap. It'll all seem clearer afterwards :o)
2007-02-11 08:28:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by Tish P 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
I never really put that much thought into the whole idea ... But I suppose someone could have..
2007-02-11 08:36:19
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Lolz. Quite funny =)
2007-02-11 08:34:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by Lauren 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
kind of confusing...both sexes r represented as 1
2007-02-11 08:31:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by ky11 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
THE PICTURE ON THE AVATAR SHOULD HAVE BEEN UNISEX, NOT MALE CENTERED AS IS THE CASE.
2007-02-11 08:40:54
·
answer #9
·
answered by buttercup 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
well you accomplished what you wanted to do... i hope you get the reaction you were looking for...
2007-02-11 08:24:12
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋