if I were a woman cleanliness would be a big part of the act,..
that cheesy scum associated with that foreskin would ultimately make me vomit gallons,
and who knows how much bacteria women have to endure,..yuck,...
2007-02-11 00:06:47
·
answer #1
·
answered by iroc 7
·
1⤊
5⤋
I have read many reports that say that being uncircumsized greatly benefits both men and women. The "gliding" action of the foreskin adds much more pleasure to sex for both the male and female. Because of the foreskin, the penis' glands are also a lot more sensitive, again, adding to the pleasure.
An uncircumsized penis can be as clean as a circumsized one, it just takes a little longer to clean. Having a "smegma-filled" penis is very rare, and can be easily prevented by taking a shower once a day. I'm uncircumsized, I shower everyday, and have never had any smegma under my foreskin. As far as cleanliness goes, you can compare an uncircumsized penis to a vagina. If you wash your vagina, you don't have to worry about any smells or bacteria, right? Well, the same goes for the uncircumsized penis, too.
2007-02-11 01:56:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well i am not a doctor. But i dont think it makes a different in sex itself. I have had sex with a person not circumsized. I dont think there is much of a difference. I think people think it looks funny or something. The only bad thing i think about not being circumsized is that if not washed properly then germs will say inside and could cause problems or more likely to get infection. If washed properly then i dont think any thing is wrong with it. I mean long ago i really dont think they circumsized males when they were born.
2007-02-11 00:09:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
NOT being a guy I dont really know but for a woman who is having sex with an uncircumcized man it does make a difference in oral sex only. That extra bit of skin can be a pain in the backside.
Personally I like circumsized men. They are much more likely to be clean. A lot of men dont know how to care for their penis"s
2007-02-11 00:50:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
It removes 15 square inches of sensitive skin in an adult, violating the infant's right to whole genitals. No medical organisation in the world recommends routine circumcision, as the risks equal or outweigh the dubious benefits. It changes the way men masturbate, removing the gliding action of the skin as it slides on itself and acts like lube. Circumcised men masturbate with what skin the have left or they use lube or do it dry. Some women report sex is gentler and more satisfying with an intact man because he doesn't have to thrust as hard and as fast to feel something and the foreskin makes entry easier and holds lubrication in during intercourse.
The intact penis is just as easy to clean as female genitals, which collect just as much smegma and are possibly slightly more prone to infections.
The only major problems with foreskins are phimosis and tight frenulum. They only affect a small proportion of intact men, most of whom experience no major problems with their penis. Phimosis is treatable with stretching and Betamethasone cream and tight frenulum can be similarly treated or there is the small operation of frenuloplasty that removes no tissue but lengthens the frenulum with a Z-shaped cut.
Many men resent being circumcised as infants and some attempt to restore their foreskin by stretching.
Geoff
2007-02-11 00:50:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by GeoffB 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
i noticed no difference, my first husband was not circumsized, but then a few years into the marriage he had the operation to be,,,,,, due to irritation,,,,,, so i guess that was the only difference,,,,,, if not circumsized, there is more friction to the man during sex and possibility for irritation
2007-02-11 00:07:16
·
answer #6
·
answered by dlin333 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
yes it does... that which is cut off at birth protects the sensitive nerve endings in the glans.....
much like the "hood" protects the female...
and... since many doctors are butchers when it comes to performing circumcisions.... I know men who have very decreased sensation as the pleasure nerves were damaged..
any one who tells you that it doesn't hurt.. is WRONG....
that foreskin was there for a reason.....
to protect...
and the big deal is that americans were sold a bill of goods... by being told it is easier to keep clean etc.....
don't listen.. and save your son's from the knife....
2007-02-11 00:08:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by Boomer 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
From what i heard uncircumsized guys give better sex. Maybe it's because the foreskin is kind of used as another source of friction or something.
2007-02-11 03:08:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
A circumcised penis is a little less sensitive than an uncircumcised penis. It makes no difference at all to the woman
2007-02-11 00:05:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
No difference in sex, just a bit harder to keep everything clean.
2007-02-11 00:04:44
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
as far as I know it really does not make a difference, they just have to make sure they clean better. alot of people might see it as a big deal.but that is their opionion.
2007-02-11 00:07:33
·
answer #11
·
answered by misty blue 6
·
0⤊
1⤋