Maybe we could send some insurgents from Iraq...
2007-02-10 23:44:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I don't see another option. Irans nuke factory is buried so deep only our latest nuke bunker buster can reach them. The only real question is how much of its military to we take out at the same time to prevent them from striking out, and do we use nukes for that job? I think if a country has nukes we should take off the gloves and nuke em first.
The Persians have been a constant problem for the western world for thousands of years. Marathon, Thermopylea, and Guagamela every time they have been slapped down and yet come back for more. I say we turn Iran into a crater and be done with them.
2007-02-11 00:00:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by Roadkill 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
You do your country and President Bush no favours with this question as many people already view the American Military as "trigger happy". Even if all diplomatic and political avenues have been explored to end nuclear development (and this has not yet been proven) in Iran the statement "nuking Iran" is tantamount to incitement to murder. Why the description murder? Because that is the easy way! Anyone with any sense and intelligence knows that the easy way is hardly ever a long term answer to a complicated problem such as this. Be a man and consider whether when you encounter a problem do you obliterate it so you don't have to worry about it any more or do you face the problem so that there is a happy overall solution for others and not just yourself. I call it selfish and cowardly.
2007-02-11 00:04:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by artisana222 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
what are you talking about?you think nuking some place is that easy?do you know anything about the devestations it will bring?
if anyone nukes anyone, a whole nuclear war is gonna start.so if you're thinkin US will nuke iran and things will be over and peaceful, you're dead wrong.any nuke in that region will just start a nuclear war.iran against israel.pakistan against india.china and russia. every country in the world will be damaged.the U.S most of all.think next time before saying such a thing.
2007-02-12 06:59:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by Ali B 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is no reason to nuke Iran. If they did something that bad then the whole world would simply run them over.
Besides you are talking about a country that has 50 American built F-16's that have been in a hanger for 15 years and they can't make them fly. What are the odds of them building a nuke and not accidentally blowing themselves up.
2007-02-10 23:50:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by snowball45830 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
there's a large difference between bombing someplace that could be justified less than certain situations and NUKES which poisons quite everyone and each little thing. not quite everyone uncovered to radiation dies of thyroid maximum cancers. Many proceed to exist with very severe well being and reproductive ailment. This spreads international huge. It received't in basic terms be in Iran. we've the technologies to drop a sensible nuclear loose bomb on each person we choose. Why the heck may we prefer to spread (extra) radiation in the course of the planet?
2016-11-27 00:26:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
None, because I want to live. Don't you?
When you say "something must be done" - why? Is it because you are afraid if Iran has a nuclear weapon they're going to nuke Israel? PLEASE! They may be crazy, but they're not that crazy. Israel would retaliate with their own nukes, then maybe Pakistan would nuke India, then maybe the US would nuke Pakistan, then maybe Russia would nuke the US, then the UK would nuke Russia....
You know, when we nuked Nagasaki and Hiroshima we had no idea of the devastation these weapons cause, nor of the long-term after-effects of nuclear fall-out, nor of the half-life of ground radiation. Now that we do know, we would never do it again, and nobody who wants to continue to live, be they Iranian, Israeli, French or Chinese, would do it.
Countries who want nukes (and Iran is just one of many; even modern pacifist Japan wants one now to counter the possible threat of North Korea), want them as deterrents. The logic goes, "If I have a nuke, you won't attack me, not even with conventional weapons". That logic kept us from obliterating the Earth all during the Cold War.
2007-02-11 00:08:36
·
answer #7
·
answered by lesroys 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
Are you speaking about people lives?nuke somewhere> is it so easy!!
anyone nukes pakestan while they were developing a nuke or india.If iran attacks any country with a nuke then nuke it all.
2007-02-11 07:19:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I could wake up in the morning and read my paper to decide nuking Iran would be a swell idea.
2007-02-10 23:49:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by Damn Good Dawg 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
I would be in favor of nuking Iran only in response to Irans use of a nuclear weapon or if it provided a nuke for a terrorist to use.
2007-02-10 23:48:54
·
answer #10
·
answered by Doug 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
If Iran attacks Israel or any of it's neighbors or
tries to smuggle any dirty bomb into the US via
the Al Qaida Terror Network.
2007-02-10 23:55:13
·
answer #11
·
answered by Vagabond5879 7
·
2⤊
0⤋