First her 80 year old husband dies. She kept a part of his fortune. Then the son of the diseased husband's son dies while paper work is still in trial about the fortune, then her baby is born then Ana's son dies a week later. And 6 months after his son's death she dies? is this coinsidence? Or did her son take her with him?...
2007-02-10 21:23:33 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Media & Journalism
Lifestyle, lifestyle, lifestyle. That is what took all of them.
The old coot obviously had a good long life. The son was likey a self indulgent pig and greed and stress did him in. Anna's kid was obviously on drugs...what else do American kids do these days besides booze and drugs? So why is that a surprise.
Show me an American who isn't on drugs, prescribed or otherwise and I'll show you a.....foreigner.
As for Anna Nicole, I've said it before, the only GOOD thing that ever came of her life and choices were her children, but really just Daniel. Her daughter came too late to save her. Anna Nicole said the only reason she is hanging on is because of her daughter and she could never have done it at all without her lawyer....but I don't think either were enough to make up for the deep void that losing Daniel left in her life.
I think she realized that nothing else mattered and she would have sacrificed it all for her son back. I say that as a mother because I know I would feel the same.
But in the end, I don't think she had what it took to get over the loss, and she literally died of heartbreak. There will be a physical cause no doubt, but she wouldn't be the first person who has died of "heartbreak". I watched my aunt fade off and die within 6 months of losing her husband. It IS like they take you with them...but Daniel took her with him when he died. Her body just took a little longer to give in.
2007-02-10 23:48:59 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think Ana was just so heartbroken after her son's death, I also believe that a loved one who has gone on does come back for those they love, her son knew she was suffering. But at this time those two are okay, we have to now pray for the baby, she is still in mortal sense and should be allowed to live a little girls life (which will be very media involved as well as full of the ills of wealth), even though she won't have her brother or mother, in a mortal sense.
2007-02-10 22:02:59 · answer #2 · answered by Bethy4 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's certainly not possible that her son took her with him. but it is possible that she was so griefstricken over his death that she died of a broken heart. Grief is a powerful thing & does different things to different people. She may have in her grief, accidently taken too much medication. Or perhaps the grief was just too stressful for her heart to handle. I just hope she can now have some peace. And the the true identity of her daughter's father is determined soon so she can be out of the circus media & have as normal of a life without a mother as possible.
2007-02-10 22:32:25 · answer #3 · answered by Sandi Beach 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
There's a lot of spiteful jealous people out there isn't there....& of course, you all live perfect unselfish lives....you know nothing of the likes of Anne Nicol Smith accept what you read in the newspapers....God! is that the extent of your knowledge & intelligence that you actually take what the papers say & believe it.....perhaps everyone needs to practice the saying "there but for the grace of God, go I"
Leave the poor girl alone & stop speculating in things you know nothing
2007-02-11 07:20:53 · answer #4 · answered by Funky 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First of all get the story right. Her husband was alot older than 80. She never saw he fortune it is still in limbo. Could everyone stop speculating. Wait for the rest of the autopsy to be done.
2007-02-11 01:40:26 · answer #5 · answered by Kim 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nothing unusual about a 90 year old man dying or his 67 year old son during his legal battle. As for her son, if he took her with him it would have happened long before now. Just a coincidence. Fame and infamy killed her.
2007-02-10 21:35:26 · answer #6 · answered by Cherry_Blossom 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i do no longer think of she replace into murdered. It would desire to have been a case of drug over-dose, unexpected cardiac arrest and so on. The saddening and sickening element is, 3 adult adult males claiming paternity over the infant. undesirable new child! contemplate whether Anna's soul would relax in peace!!
2016-11-03 03:25:59 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
In the papers it says Anna was having nightmares about her son dying and he was telling her to 'come and join him' so i think she probably took her own life
2007-02-10 22:01:10 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think so. She is just another hysterical female like Paula Yates who are pre destined to have tragic lives, as they can't act like normal people for most of their lives anyway, and they make a big mess of their lives and relationships, and then leave behind a big mess because they are and were SELFISH.
2007-02-10 21:33:17 · answer #9 · answered by Juliette 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
if by... "take her with him" you mean... the torment and the grievances shes experienced associated with the sad events in her life, which probably ultimately led to her death... then yes.
i dont think she ever really came to terms with the sudden death of her son.
and her body was just pushing her on on overload...
eh.
2007-02-10 21:32:15 · answer #10 · answered by onedrop808 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋