what is the difference between Mr.Bush & Osama Bin Laden on a moral ground?

Question

I feel that there is no difference between Mr. Bush & Osama Bin Laden. The president has a revenge attitude after 9/11 and killed (still killing and planning to kill Iranian people) millions of people in response to 9/11 attacks and still he is not over after so much misery, blood shed, chaos. on the other hand, osama bin laden carried out killings of americans and their interest for their political supremacy, by force and occupation of oil resourceful lands of the arabs. i don't see any moral difference, in fact, bush will get more punishment for his crimes comparing to osama because of the casualties are more comparing to his counterpart if God comes to save the world from terrorists and political leaders because both have taken the law into their own hands for their own aims and witnesses(the dead and the alive) will also suggests more punishment for Bush

Answer 1

There is no difference on moral ground. Both do not care if they kill innocent women and children with bombs.

Answer 2

Interesting opinion. Here's mine.

The similarities of the two are that Bush and Bin Laden are both figureheads of extremely powerful factions.

The differences are ideological in that G.W. feels that he is doing the right thing (spreading democracy) and Bin Laden's camp feels that they are protecting their sacred religion/way of life from western infidels.

After WWII the U.S. has pretty much adopted a "police-the-world" policy and well what do you expect after Dec. 7, 1941? If we don't try to quash the threat there then we will eventually fight the battle here and I don't think anybody wants that~! Problem is everybody thinks of instant gratification (winning) and that's not how wars work. If the U.S. pulls out now I think we all know who will fill the political vaccuum after the infant Iraqi gov't is sacked by the insurgents!

I personally think that Bush is listening to some ******* morons and although a balance of pwr is struck now with the Senate I can only hope that the compromise will help Iraq, help control the word "terrorism" and keep our troops and the world half-assed safe from animosity of islam.

Answer 3

Nelson Mandella became a guy for civil rights and against racism and imperialism. Osama Bin laden is against different imperialism. the present equipment creates abuse so if the equipment is long gone then Osama like Mandella would quit his combat simply by fact the circumstances more suitable to it are long gone. the belief of a Nobel Peace Prize in any respect would seem unusual in case you think of roughly it as peace would desire to be some thing people have as a remember of path so as that they'd desire to no longer obtain any award for it. My ideas although are that Douglas Roche may be a contender as Roche looks trustworthy

Answer 4

What did Osama do on 9/11, I dont think we caught him nor tried him in any court. No evidence of him doing it have come out. I believe he was quoted saying he didn't do it at one time and since then all the people who think he did it have based it on heresay from the government. In fact they even said they couldnt prove he did it. And as to the question, they both are on the same side for god's sake. Same agenda, same payroll, look it up.

Answer 5

Although your statement circles around the real issues it is not far from reality. If we are to consider their similarities we will be led to inevitable conclusions. Both are religious fanatics and each is a conservative of his genre. Usama triggered the attack in the Middle East and Bush is recruiting for Usama. They feed off of oneanother with agility but not grace.
Morality goes out the window with fanatics.

Answer 6

I think Bush is criminally inept and has this silly cowboy-esque vision of the U.S as a knight on a white horse saving the "heathens" from damnnation, oppression, and their lack of McDonalds and Starbucks. Bin Laden is willfully destructive and deliberately targets innocent people for political gain. As much as I loathe our president, I don't believe he is actively targeting (or ordering the targeting) of thousands of innocent civilians. I think there is a moral difference between being stupid/inept and willfully evil.

Answer 7

Well,you just got to express your opinion with freedom,now
here is my opinion,ok? I think those who are as ignorant as
you are,should have special eduaction and private schooling.
You are certainly unaware of actual events going on in the
world,and you could actually pose a very real threat to your
self & to others. I feel there is no difference between you &
a Mime locked in a box!!! You can go through all the silly
motions all you want to,but in the end,you won't ever be
taken seriously or listened to. Your ignorance is too clear!

Answer 8

It depends on what you believe in. If you believe in Allah and Islam, then you will likely believe that Osama is more moral because he is fighting for Allah. If you believe in God and the freedoms that our country was founded on many presidents before Bush, GW is more moral. Islamic fascists want the entire world to succumb to their religion. Where as GW wants the world to succumb to the freedom to believe in whatever religion they want to. I realize that on the domestic front, GW pushes his Christian beliefs, but on a global front, he is pushing for freedom of religion.

Answer 9

No differences ..both are the same....

but at least Osama Bin Laden still believe in GOD....:)

Answer 10

"President George W.Bush's decision to invade Iraq in 2003 ultimately may come to be seen as one of the most profligate actions in the history of American Foreign policy."