I like WWE , but I really enjoy TNA (total non-stop action) wresling more!
I consider it to be more entertaining.
What do you guys think?
2007-02-10 18:00:18 · 18 answers · asked by yomama23 3 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
I like TNA better cause it stays true to wrestling, WWE has turned into a Three Ring Circus show for little kids, that's not what it's supposed to be about. It's supposed to be about the wrestling, and putting on great matches and great ORIGINAL storylines, not the same crap over and over like WWE shows.
2007-02-10 21:11:31 · answer #1 · answered by revman_237 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I prefer their wrestling style much more over WWE. It's a faster pace, and most of their wrestlers have better move sets than the WWE stars. Vince doesn't like fast and high flying, technical stuff... he likes the big guy bodybuilder bruisers. The cruiserweights are not considered that important, whereas the X Division in TNA is on the same level as the others. Furthermore, most of the main stars in any area of TNA are more normal looking, even the champs.
I definitely think the better promos and humor is over in TNA as well. WWE can still do decent segments, but it's more hit and miss. TNA... I think Eric Young is comedy gold, and I've loved how Eye Spy Productions has evolved into its humor role as well. I think TNA has better promos overall, and have more of an old school feel to them.
I watch RAW, SD, TNA (even WSX)... but the one I look forward to the most is TNA.
2007-02-10 18:19:37 · answer #2 · answered by Cruel Angel 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I think TNA is putting out better story lines. I still think Vince Russo is the best writer out ther. WWE and preferably Smackdown is doing better in that dept. Michael Hayes is really bringing SD around. If Raw would get some more talent they could dominate again. Especially if they would stay away from matches like Trump vs. Rosie (GAG). RAW has about 3 Superstars carrying the whole Shbang. HBK, Edge, and Orton.The others are helping some or are dead weight.
2007-02-10 19:25:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I like the ideas TNA has, but storylines are awful and the action is kind of a spotfest. They need to slow it down and relax a little more. Not to mention, the ring needs to go. It's always been a 4-sided ring, no need to change it.
2007-02-10 18:05:30 · answer #4 · answered by mauiman240 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I watch them both and enjoy both of them but I still prefer the wwe.
2007-02-11 04:25:41 · answer #5 · answered by jamaican babe 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What's the difference? They're both so fake I change the station after about 10 secs. Old school WWF (80's-early 90's) rules.
2007-02-10 18:09:54 · answer #6 · answered by man_of_mustard 3 · 0⤊ 2⤋
TNA is "terrible", it's the bone yard of WWE. Kirk Angle was going to improve it, but it doen't seem to have done any good. Vince McMann "rules sports entertainment", but I guess in the world of Saks and Macy's you have to have a K-mart and a Wal-Mart to.
2007-02-10 18:09:53 · answer #7 · answered by VIGO123 1 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I love the promos in TNA.
2007-02-10 18:29:10 · answer #8 · answered by I'll Take That One! 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The only wrestling worth watching is old school WWF...the new stuff is garbage
2007-02-10 18:04:20 · answer #9 · answered by Wanderer 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I just like wwe better
2007-02-10 18:11:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋