Malkin? Latendresse? This is all too much to handle. Malkin and Latendresse have a combined 105 games. Latendresse!?! Jesus Christ Hab Fan.
Sid is the obvious choice for the future, he will get stronger and further ahead of the competition, he just is not ready physically. To the candidates...
Joe Thorton; turned Cheechoo in Maurice Richard. Deserves Recognition. Reigning Hart (MVP) and Art Ross(League Leader in Points)
Joe Sakic and Peter Forsberg, both are past their respective primes. Sakic 1291 GP 1549 PTS +43. Forsberg, 678 GP 853 PTS +228. Mathematically speaking, if Forsberg had Sakics' durability he would have close to 1700 points.
Winner is Nick Lidstrom 1152 GP 854 PTS +334. Playoff bound every year of his career, 4 time Norris winner.
Unmentioned, Jagr (#12 all time scoring).
To the guy who called out Gretzky, 970 more points than anyone in history, stop it. (970 is more than Forsberg's career, see above)
Stop talking about what you do not know.
2007-02-10 17:05:07 · 4 answers · asked by You Bums 1 in Sports ➔ Hockey
Nick Lidstrom is often over looked in the Best player question. Everyone wants to say Ovey and Crosby are the best but their careers are too young to hang that title on. Malkin and Semin are quietly coming up behind and could surpass both Ovey and Crosby.
Not everyone uses the same criteria, tho'. And maybe it's really someone no one has mentioned yet. Just my two cents!
2007-02-11 05:23:54 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Currently I would say Crosby.
2007-02-13 17:02:25 · answer #2 · answered by mapleleafskickass 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Right now its probably Crosby
2007-02-11 01:50:39 · answer #3 · answered by law 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Joe Thorton for sure!!!!!
GO SAN JOSE SHARKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-02-11 15:01:17 · answer #4 · answered by Jenna 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋