Negative. All such 'evidence' has proven to be a hoax. There is no reliable evidence that it is there.
The tale of the ark as described in the Bible is not possible. Such a vessel could not float and remain intact, let alone do so weighed down by 2 pair of all unclean animals and 7 pairs of all clean animals.
2007-02-10 16:57:28
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
assuming that the flood did accure, when the Ark came to rest on the mountain(s) of Ararat. (it states very clearly the word Mountains, meaning more then one.) Noah's family would have had to use most if not all of the ark to build homes with the wood of the ark. So had it been there at one time I do not think it is there any more.
2007-02-10 17:19:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by LadyCatherine 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
don't know for sure but the most recent studies would say yes. Actually I thought I read somewhere (prior to the above) that Noah's Ark was in the western USA. Only time will prove it out.
2007-02-10 16:57:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by sophieb 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oh, trust an answerer above to think it would be in the US.
You will find no trace of Noah's Ark anywhere on earth.
It never existed.
2007-02-10 17:04:19
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I know they have been looking for this for centuries , they'll never find Noah's Ark as it never existed in the first place...
2007-02-10 19:57:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by Bunge 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
first off this is religious nonsense i nean look at the facts the guy had the entire planet covered with water then he smashed into the only piece of land sticking more like a drunk working for Exxon than a biblical figure
2007-02-10 21:00:40
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
www.creationscience.com claims it is. The government of Turkey will not let anyone up there because of religious reasons. Makes a person wonder.
2007-02-11 03:28:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's what many believe...unfortunately, the "ship", as many believe it is, is too far up in the mountain peaks for anyone to travel to or reach...so just photos are available, aerial photos, etc.
2007-02-14 03:14:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by EvelynMine 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Possible, but real physical evidence is lacking.
2007-02-14 03:15:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by jerry 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Possible, but real physical evidence is lacking.
2007-02-10 23:58:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋