English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

6 answers

Both, & you can add corrupt.

2007-02-10 17:17:46 · answer #1 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 17 0

Rampant corruption--full of despotic deceivers--geared towards anti-semitism.
Why aren't we kicking them out and start a new one? The only thing that seems to be working there is UNICEF. The U.N. 'peace' keeping is a complete and utter joke, they are only interested in knocking the U.S.A. down and they ran away at the first sign of trouble in Iraq--after they all said it was OK to do something there with the dreadful Saddam Hussein.
Pathetic would be an understatement.

2007-02-11 00:51:45 · answer #2 · answered by Mr_B 5 · 2 0

Depends on who wants international peacekeeping and equal standards. If we, as the nation who started the UN, are not willing to go by it's law's, how then do we make Iran submit for inspection? I think we have a lot of nerve even asking it after what we have done!

2007-02-11 00:55:19 · answer #3 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0 2

The UN is irrelevant because countries do not respect it as a world government since it is only a tool used by the US to attack countries like Iraq.

2007-02-11 01:22:07 · answer #4 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0 3

The UN exists "to be seen to be protecting" the people of this world.

2007-02-11 00:44:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Both.

2007-02-11 00:44:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers