English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Molten, beyond red hot, "steel" was video recorded coming out of the South Tower just before it collapsed. Jet fuel does not burn hot enough to turn steel to liquid. Melted red hot steel was also found in "ground zero" of all three WTC buildings, including WTC7; the one no jet ever hit.
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ExrVgioIXvk&search=thermite
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3D2myMbQjQ

2007-02-10 14:30:39 · 14 answers · asked by Joe_Pardy 5 in Politics & Government Government

14 answers

Because 9/11 was an Inside Job,. Steven E Jones tested it for thermite and there was traces of it on the support pillars, Proven to cut them. Main piece of evidence for an inside job.

Watch "TERRORSTORM" In google video.

2007-02-10 15:33:48 · answer #1 · answered by Alert 1 · 2 5

CB is TOTALLY correct!

While Jet Fuel on its own will not burn hot enough to liquify steel, try to keep in my that there was enough paper, and other combustible material to enhance the fire.

Another interesting tidbit for you is that in Medeval times, and even at the beginning of the industrial revolution, steel and iron workers (Blacksmiths) found that a lower temperature furnace could melt steel with the introduction of oxygen UNDER the flame. I'm not sure if you are exactly apprised of the infrastructure of the WTC, but there was a subway station (PATH) under the towers. The tunnel is under some substantial pressure as it runs beneath the Hudson River and is long enough to deliver a massive amount of air (oxygen) to the basement of the WTC creating an updraft within the fire that very plausably would propel the fire to a heat high enough to liquify tempered structural steel.

Please don't believe everything you see on YouTube, I sincerely doubt that this is what the creators of Youtube intended it for.

2007-02-10 14:47:16 · answer #2 · answered by Porterhouse 5 · 2 0

The planes are largely made out of aluminum. Aluminum will melt at these temperatures.

Also, the collapse of the building generates quite a lot of heat, certainly enough to melt the steel. More energy was released when the buildings fell than would have been provided by the jet fuel.

2007-02-10 14:48:26 · answer #3 · answered by professional student 4 · 2 0

I know about it all and I agree and for those who call this a theory didn't do so hot in science I see. Since this is some evidence of it, it is no longer considered a theory, but a conspiracy. All of this, I heard started from the JFK assassination. People don't and probably won't believe because they are ignorant, don't care, or just scared. So keep spreading the message so that at least the ones that are warned know how to handle it.

2016-05-25 07:29:42 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Here is the truth... 19 Arab terrorists hijacked four airplanes on September 11, 2001. Two of those planes were flown directly into the Twin Towers. One of the planes was flown into the Pentagon. The final plane was brought down by the passengers aboard that plane making them among the first of many heroes to die that day by willingly sacrificing their lives in order to prevent the loss of even more life.

The 343 members of the NYFD, the 23 members of the NYPD and the 37 members of the PAPD all ran against the tide of fleeing people in the hope that they could save more people from the tragic fate that beset nearly 3,000 thousand people that day. The government was not behind it. The feeling of horror that sat in the pit of the stomach of the Average Joe that day was shared by every politician and government official.

The towers collapsed because of the fire that ensued following the impact of two massive jetliners loaded with highly flammable fuel and the contents of the buildings themselves burnt uncontrollably. Building 7 collapsed because of the massive damage it suffered during the collapse of the two 110 story buildings that were within a stone’s throw from it. Trinity Church didn’t even have one broken window in spite of being in the shadow of the two buildings. It was surely not because those responsible for the attack had any reverence for life, God or structures. It was just the way it happened.

Questioning the truth does not make it untrue. Refusing to accept it makes you stupid. The ones who run those sites you claim contain the truth are profiting from your paranoia and are exploiting the simple minded. You are either too fatuous to realize you are being duped or you are part of the group who is out to take advantage of the naive. Either way, nothing you have pointed to will ever sway anyone who has a modicum of intelligence coupled with the mental acumen required to avoid being institutionalized and the ability to walk upright.

When you others of your ilk postulate that the obvious is not true you sully not only yourselves but the memory of the victims of the attacks and the memory of those who so bravely gave their lives that day.

2007-02-10 14:37:08 · answer #5 · answered by C B 6 · 5 2

It sure looks like molten metal to me, but I'm just a layman. Could it be something else? I realize that burning jet fuel isn't hot enough to melt steel, but could it be a metal that isn't steel? Are you sure that it is even steel in the video?

2007-02-10 15:16:41 · answer #6 · answered by Jesus Jones 4 · 1 0

You just happen to know how hot Jet Fuel burns, now do you really? Come on. I will take video of the towers a video of Richard Nixon and a video of the space shuttle and prove to your kind that he flew the shuttle into the towers. All I need is the videos, and my trusty video editing program.
This question has been asked so many times on here that we thought even you aluminum hat wearers would get tired of it.

2007-02-10 14:45:15 · answer #7 · answered by Debbie T 2 · 3 0

If it was metal it could easily have been aluminum which has a low melting point. A lot of metal in offices is aluminum, such as drop ceiling grids and window frames.

However, the liquid that was pouring out of the windows appears to be water from the fire suppression system. There was lots of glass and water falling throughout the tragedy, no one mentioned motlen metal.

2007-02-10 14:43:15 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Thumbs up to C B! Stated very well. Anyone who buys into THIS conspiracy theory and propagates it should be considered traitors as this kind of talk only attempts to provide sympathy to the real murderers who are presently being dealt with in a just fashion.

2007-02-10 14:57:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

well for one thing the inside of the tower was reaching about 600 degrees farenheit
and also the jet feul was keeping the fire ging so the meatal could have gotten alot hotter espeasily since it is a good conductor of heat.

2007-02-10 14:42:06 · answer #10 · answered by Vikki[Rawhr] 3 · 0 0

I guess what you're saying is the U.S. Gov't was behind the planes crashing into the Twin Towers, the Pentagon and into the field in Pa. I bet you believe that UNICORNS actually existed and the Tooth fairy is NOT mom.

2007-02-10 14:40:10 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers