Who wins in the debate between Obama and Hillary on the social issues?

Answer 1

Trying to get solid stances on the issues from ANY politician is like trying to pull chicken teeth. In the future, I want to vote only on people who have been here on Yahoo Answers and who have casually revealed their hearts and visions and good and bad over the months. I'm serious. I can't stand this wishy-washy sucking up to as many voters as possible with mush mouth nonsense anymore. This nation has BIG problems. The average U.S. citizen has the critical-thinking skills of an amoeba, partly due to wishy-washy, polarized political representations of even the most simple national housekeeping issues. Our leaders MUST start addressing the issues dead on and clearly open up their intentions and tell us what we are really being asked to follow so that people can have a legitimate chance to understand what's going on and what's at stake. As for answering your actual question (sorry), Clinton has done some recognizable work and knows the non-linear realities of keeping a pluralistic nation running. Obama, on the other hand, with his formal Muslim training and cozy association with Christian fundamentals is basically presenting a fascist image of "everything - would - be - great - and - dandy - if - everyone - would - just - accept - my - one - and - only - set - of - virtures". No thank you. That ain't ever going to work. Behind that freshly scrubbed Christian facade of wholesomeness always lurks the "other" shoe that falls . . the " . . .and if you DON'T go along with my "one - and - only - path - to - salvation" we will make laws to take your rights away and FORCE you to see the light". The LAST thing this nation needs right now is another "wholesome" fascist problem-solver like that. I can't put my finger on it. But, there's something not right about Obama's intentions.

Answer 2

up to now Obama hasn't taken any solid stances. it really is an outstanding first round approach. That way maximum persons will vote for personality or race, or the potential of change. because McCain ran earlier, and he has a lengthy list interior the senate, there is extra information about the position he stands. Now, the respond to the question. i imagine John McCain is a especially respectable debater. Obama is more recent to it, and that i imagine that provides ole' John the aspect. the controversy that i'd like to work out is Rudy vs. Hillary. i do not choose both one to win the nomination, yet i imagine Rudy has the debating qualifications. anybody yet Hillary!

Answer 3

Hillary is one of the most polarizing candidates, ever, she wins for sure, Obama is easy, laid back and wants to be liked. Hillary stands for what she beleves in and thats the people of this country, and all the underdogs of the world. Thats what the social issues are all about.

Answer 4

It all depends on what social issues are the most important to you.

I don't think either candidate has clearly outlined their social platform yet; hopefully they will do so before the primary election!

My advice is to wait until the debates, and more info is posted on their respective websites before trying to make a decision.

Answer 5

Thats a tough one, Obama probably, but do not discount Hillary's experience. But Obama is a smooth talker and just as intelligent as Hillary, I think I go with Hillary because of her experience.

Answer 6

Today I would say Obama, but Hillary is practicing her cue cards.

Answer 7

obama . hillary seems to angry /frustrated a lady these days . allmost like shes carrying a grudge

Answer 8

One flunked and the other one lied , as usual.

Answer 9

It is hard to say until they have one, definitely will be interesting to watch.

Answer 10

it depends who is trying to be the biggest socialist out of the two, so far I think it's a tie.