English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If you don't rebel against this 'World Freak Show' then u aint no shepherd and u probably aint heard of Judith Kepple.
You know,the won off 'winnin millionaire' and now constant panelist on Wish you Were 'Eggheads'Hmmmm

2007-02-10 13:50:54 · 16 answers · asked by superfurrymuck 2 in Society & Culture Cultures & Groups Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender

Sorry if thrown some people off.Personally i am a nihilist bordering on solipsism

2007-02-10 13:56:51 · update #1

really am mystified by some answers so far,i am not an anarchist!
i hate cats thats all. I just think theres not enough rebellion in the world today.We are the doormats yer know?

2007-02-10 14:24:07 · update #2

Merde! didnt realise it was in G and LB section,cheers whoever sent that but we all gotta brain anyways

2007-02-11 04:00:14 · update #3

16 answers

I'll tell you why anarchy is so unaceptable, my son...it's because you boys can waltz away after playing with all of your toys and we Earth Moms have got to stay behind and Clean up after you! Nothing worse than a whole world trashed by a bunch of boys on a rampage....(sigh) gotta go get the broom and dust buster again *grumble grumble* there goes the enviroment for a few thousand years.....look at all that glass.......they never pick anything up!!!...*grumble grumble*

2007-02-10 14:55:02 · answer #1 · answered by Mama Otter 7 · 0 0

I think you have a point in the sense that you need to rebel against the system as it exists. HOwever anarchy leaves you with no system, no rules - nothing. So, really it is going from one extreme to another. I think what I would ideally look for is a society of smaller socieites. No one is realistically going to be able to settle for a universal system - it just isn't possible. Yes there would be certain links, such as trade, etc between these societies. However I believe these societies would be self governing led by the people within those societies. I know there would probably be fights about who was on the best land and wanting something that your neighour has and so on. However the idea is still workable - get back to basics and worry about making your local community and neighbours. Yes there is a bigger world picture, but sort out your own backyard first!

2007-02-11 02:33:18 · answer #2 · answered by waggy 6 · 0 0

I am actually an anarchist. I don't agree with the government system and want the whole thing to be abolished. The problem with doing this is that you then need everyone to work together in order to create a decent society. There would be no one telling you what to do but you would do things out of decency and common sense. People see it as unacceptable because no one trusts the other to behave responsibly without having someone hold a gun to their head. We are organised because people think without organisation things would be chaos.

2007-02-10 22:42:42 · answer #3 · answered by SR13 6 · 0 0

There's a difference between anarchy and terrorism. With anarchy, there is no law. Without law or law enforcment, there is a power vaccuum. In a vaccuum, anybody and everybody who wants to take power will fight eachother for it until somebody wins. Then they take power, make up the rules that are necessary to keep themselves in power, and that's where we've been ever since. I don't understand what Judith Kepple has to do with anarchy.

P.S. I'm open to solipsism.

2007-02-10 21:55:45 · answer #4 · answered by Mickey Mouse Spears 7 · 0 0

Anarchy lacks structure mean it is very had to accomplish anything just imagine trying to design a product with no one to control and direct people would be off trying to do other things.
I belive that a perfect society is the one that gives people the maixmum freedom for social interaction within a framework so people don't just do what every they wish with no reguards for consquences

2007-02-11 06:38:31 · answer #5 · answered by nurgle69 7 · 0 0

I am very confused by your query? Anarchy means rebellion. I know when my boys were teens they thought it was cool to be anarchists. So, you could be rebelling against just about anything not just your so called "world freak show." Who or what is "winnin millionaire" and what is this "panal" of eggheads.

2007-02-10 22:14:02 · answer #6 · answered by kar506 3 · 0 0

Because Anarchy is just that; Anarchy. In place of structure and order it offers Chaos. Sorry, I like having the mail run, the trash removed, road signs and laws.

2007-02-10 22:02:22 · answer #7 · answered by AdamKadmon 7 · 0 0

if you drop a stone in the water then it creates ripples which move outwards, so that is compared to a self centred person who considers themselves the centre of the universe. Annarchy means you have many people all acting like that so its like having lots of stones falling and creating riplles, the ripples collide and cause disturbance against each other
When all the stones work in a joint co operation as eternal souls in union with divine, then there is only one ripple and no one has any friction with others, which is what anarchy produces, frustrated persons with cross interests. nice question, thanks, peace, Gouranga.

2007-02-10 21:59:54 · answer #8 · answered by Humble Bee 2 · 0 0

The difficulty with anarchy is that it is the absence of government. This leaves a vacuum of power, and aggressive, acquisitive people would likely hurry to fill that vacuum and become, thereby, the government.

2007-02-10 21:56:07 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Egads, a trick question. I have this thought that Anarchy fears chaos, where the consequences are thick. That's probably why.

2007-02-10 23:44:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers