I am not asking this for religious reasons so please so no negative responses. I am a huge admirer of Tolstoy since I am a Christian, a Pacifist, a Vegetarian, I identify with the great thinker in many ways. I have always read that he was a Christian and identified himself as a Christian, but recently in reading his 'A Letter to a Hindu' I wondered about that because of a statement he made in the letter, I have pasted it below:
If only people freed themselves from their beliefs in all kinds of Ormuzds, Brahmas, Sabbaoths, and their incarnation as Krishnas and Christs, from beliefs in Paradises and Hells, in reincarnations and resurrections, from belief in the interference of the Gods in the external affairs of the universe, and above all, if they freed themselves from belief in the infallibility of all the various Vedas, Bibles, Gospels, Tripitakas, Korans, and the like, and also freed themselves from blind belief in a variety of scientific teachings about infinitely small atoms and
2007-02-10
13:49:30
·
2 answers
·
asked by
S.H.I.E.L.D.
1
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ Philosophy
molecules and in all the infinitely great and infinitely remote worlds, their movements and origin, as well as from faith in the infallibility of the scientific law to which humanity is at present subjected: the historic law, the economic laws, the law of struggle and survival, and so on-if people only freed themselves from this terrible accumulation of futile exercises of our lower capacities of mind and memory called the
2007-02-10
13:50:11 ·
update #1
'Sciences', and from the innumerable divisions of all sorts of histories, anthropologies, homiletics, bacteriologics, jurisprudences, cosmographies, strategies-their name is legion-and freed themselves from all this harmful, stupifying ballast-the simple law of love, natural to man, accessible to all and solving all questions and perplexities, would of itself become clear and obligatory.
------------------------------------------------------
This statement of his made me question his faith, I am merely curious about it because I am eager to learn more about him. Do any other philosophy enthusiasts have any ideas on this subject?
2007-02-10
13:52:04 ·
update #2
To ringm: No my view of him would not change, as I mentioned at the end of my question I am asking this out of curiousity. I want to learn more about him. Yes, I know he converted at around 60 but he wrote 'A Letter to a Hindu' when he was 80 which is why I'm asking as his statement confused me, it is a mere curiosity.
To Nunitak: Thank you very much for your answer
--------------------------------------------------------
I look forward to hearing more views
2007-02-10
14:34:24 ·
update #3