There was 3 countries named in the axis of evil.
Iraq, Iran and North Korea.
Iran is next. North Korea will soon follow.
Need I say more?
2007-02-10 13:59:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
The Bush administration used the yankee public's concern after 9/eleven to cajole maximum folk that we would desire to consistently flow to conflict with Iraq. Now that Iraq has grow to be an entire failure, anyone is determining 'hey, perhaps affirming conflict on each usa that would desire to pose a threat to us is a foul concept'. The Bush administration did no longer attack Iraq via fact of WMDs, yet via fact you're addressing Republicans as an entire, that isn't the subject. you're making a valid factor that it is total hypocrisy for them to assist attacking a achieveable threat in Iraq and not help attacking sure threats in North Korea and Iran. yet a minimum of that's an progression. we'd be worse off in the event that they hadn't found out from their blunders and have been pushing for assaults on North Korea and Iran. So on a similar time because it is total hypocrisy, we would desire to consistently be grateful that a minimum of they found out some thing from their considerable mistake.
2016-12-17 07:07:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Power of Nightmares - Video: Part 3 of 3 - The Shadows In The Cave
The Power of Nightmares assesses whether the threat from a hidden and organised terrorist network is an illusion.
http://www.ichblog.eu/index.php?option=com_seyret&task=videodirectlink&id=118
2007-02-10 14:22:15
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Please get a new tune. This top forty hit has been played out. I could add the links of all the Democrats claiming there were WMDs. But you already know that, it just doesn't serve your purpose..
Yes we should. Listen to what Amadidajob (misspelled on purpose.) says in Arabic.
2007-02-10 14:02:18
·
answer #4
·
answered by Luchador 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
Get it straight!! Bush isn't running off to Iran, the libs and Demo's are the ones saying he is. So stop trashing him for something he hasn't even put in motion!!
2007-02-10 13:56:42
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mercadies2000 7
·
3⤊
3⤋
I never did...I personally I hope the house vetos the heck out of his new proposal and while their at it..IMPEACH HIS ****!!!
When I think of Hurricane Katrina and how AMERICANS where treated in the same country they pay taxes and those very same taxes dollars are being sent by the billions, to foreign nations...It really, truly infuriates me! He could fly Airforce One to survey the damaged but, couldn't drop a single bottle of water to those people...And..They still don't have homes, jobs, schools, NOTHING!!!!...
2007-02-10 14:02:04
·
answer #6
·
answered by Nu Nu 2
·
2⤊
4⤋
Impeachment.
It isn't just for BJs anymore!
2007-02-10 14:51:45
·
answer #7
·
answered by kent_shakespear 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Because we don't believe "sammy".
2007-02-10 13:56:35
·
answer #8
·
answered by Mr.Wise 6
·
2⤊
1⤋
imposter.
2007-02-10 17:33:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by thevillageidiotxxxxx 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
PLEASE FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, GIVE YOUR PRESIDENT SOME ATTENTION!!!! JUST AGREE WITH THE DUDE FOR ONCE!
2007-02-10 14:17:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by "RED" 3
·
0⤊
2⤋