Alright kids, first reality test. First no steel building has ever collapsed from fire. Look at the building in Madrid, Spain that burnt for 19hrs w/ white hot flames shooting a hundred feet into the air. The structural integrity stood ground. Now, steel has a melting point of around 2800-3000deg F. Jet fuel burns at 1800deg F w/ oxygen shot into it.
2. The fires were nearly out before they collapsed. People were out at the wounds of the buildings waving bandanas and trying to reach out w/ their cell phones. There's even a clip of firefighters reaching the 71st floor of one of the buildings(where the plane hit) calling to dispatch that the fires were small enough that they'd be able to take them out w/ 2 lines.
3. Footage of the WTC's from a helicopter show molten steel flowing down the sides which indicates thermite(pretty much sodium and iron being introduced to produce a hot knife on butter effect). That cut the 47 pillars of the WTC. Later from that after they collapsed. Molten steel was found @ ground zero, proving the use of thermite.
4. Reports of explosions from the basement floors. So how could the explosion somehow disapate enough force downward to incinerate the lower levels? It didn't. People intervied who were there heard huge explosions which blew out windows and most of the lower level.
5. Even if the planes crashing into the buildings caused this supposed heavy damage, it's even more amazing why they collapsed the way they did. In freefall on it's own footprint. That would indicate that there was no resistance from the lower floors(hinting explosives again, since heat travels up). Plus why did the upper part of the WTC happen to be reduced to dust by the time it hit the ground? Plus in footage of the collapse, you can see the squibs(plast points) blowing out anywhere from 5-20 floors below the collapse.
WTC 7 was a classic demolition. The crinkle in the middle, it collapsed on its own footprint, and it fell in freefall. Larry Silverstein(lease holder of all 7 buildings said "due to the heavy loss of life we had no other choice than to pull the building." Pull is the demolition term for bring down a building.
6. 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB.
2007-02-11 07:03:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by Ted S 4
·
3⤊
1⤋
This is pure nonsense. Who are these people putting out this garbage? What are they trying to prove? That little so called scientific examination failed to mention that two huge airliners loaded with fuel sliced into both buildings like samurai swords, just imagine the structural damage this alone caused. The movie suggests that the fires alone could not cause the collapse. This is psuedo-science at its' very worst. Does anyone else see the elephant in the room?
2007-02-10 14:01:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by Mookman 1
·
0⤊
3⤋
Well your little movie is wrong. The towers were designed to use steel beams, glass, and concrete floors. This made the building much lighter. When the jets full of fuel hit he towers the steel did not melt but it softened enough to allow the weight of the floors pull away and then it was just a matter of gravity. They fell the way they were designed to fall. Now most steel buildings such as the empire state building are concrete and steel, so they would have withstood the impact with less damage.
In response to your question on legality of the terror attack, I think the terrorist were not too concerned with the legal issues.
2007-02-10 13:37:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
5⤋
evil is best represented in the human situation in the form of unprovoked hatred against and coupled with an aggressive impulse to cause harm to another person or group. Such hatred can be aroused from within the individual or group through jealousy, wrong teachings or due to unexplained extra-personal forces.
2007-02-13 01:40:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why do fools like you believe every single theory that gives thrown at you, even if its not a bit rational? For example, I bet if you saw this..
http://batesmotel.8m.com/
You would say that the moon landing was a hoax almost immediatly. Now look at this page.
http://pirlwww.lpl.arizona.edu/~jscotti/NOT_faked/
Convinced?
Now responding to DZE, Building 7 along with all buildings near the WTC were evacuated. Now how Building 7 collapsed is beyond me at the moment, but just remember someone will figure out it, and you will be told.
2007-02-10 13:37:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 2
·
1⤊
3⤋
on the time we were searching outwards no longer inwards and no one had ever ordered one in each and every of our commercial jets to be shot down. We did no longer have the guidelines and orders in position to make the order to shoot down civilian plane. also, there grow to be no fighter jets in the area to shoot down the planes anyhow. As for the crumple of the homes, each and each and every of the professionals agree it is how maximum fairly tall homes would crumple in the adventure that that they had that a lot harm done to them. As for the WT7 progression, it were given hit through dissimilar falling debris that brought about it to grow to be volatile. As to Larry's words of "we pulled it and watched the progression fall" must be token that they pulled anybody out to protection in the previous the construct fell. people like you want to comprehend that it took years of creating plans and training to tug this off. different terrorists had went to flight college like ten years previous so how ought to or not that is an interior interest at the same time as Bush grow to be governing Texas at the same time as the planning all started?
2016-12-04 00:38:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by schiavone 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
nothing explains building7 ... recently even more people that were on-scene have come forward describing how the building was evacuated because of an order to pull it ... which really blows the official story out of the water because any planned demolition would have taken at least days and probably weeks to set up ...
2007-02-10 13:39:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
1⤋
Why do you suppose the structural steel in a steel building is insulated? It's not to keep it warm - it's because structural steel looses about 50% of its strength at 1300 degrees F.
What do you imagine happens to this insulation when it is bashed into by a commercial aircraft? Now you're starting to see the REAL facts..........
2007-02-10 13:38:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by LeAnne 7
·
1⤊
5⤋
Don't believe everything you see...
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=7501020220921158523&q=penn+and+teller+bullshit
try that one now.
2007-02-10 13:40:33
·
answer #9
·
answered by heavy_cow 6
·
1⤊
3⤋