Is It A Surprise To People That There Is A Consensus On Man-Mad Global Warming?

Question

Especially when those who disagree with the concept are fired from their posts or denied research grants?

Are scientists agreeing just so they can keep their jobs?

http://www.kgw.com/news-local/stories/kgw_020607_news_taylor_title.59f5d04a.html

Click the link to see just ONE of the scientists who may lose his job because of his disbelief in Global warming.

Global warming: The New Terrorism

Answer 1

No, there is no Global Warming, just a plot and scam for money.
How many more stories will we hear about the dire consequences of Global Warming? How much money will we be forced to cough up to support an idea that is unproven and is refuted by Mother Nature herself? It is cold out and no matter how hard they try this is not something they can blame on Global Warming. It is the cyclical weather pattern of the world. Perhaps they should start listening to the scientists
Al Gore and Ted Turner are on the Global Warming bandwagon this week. Gore has accused the President of intimidation with regard to scientists who believe in the theory. People like John Kerry have indicated that the reputable scientists have all signed on. There, of course, are many scientists who do not believe in man made Global Warming but that is ignored by most. Interestingly, the report from the UN was not a glowing endorsement of the idea either.

This week the Northeast is in the grip of a very cold spell. At least 19 people have died as a result of the cold and the cold is putting a strain on electrical grids and water supply systems (from water main breaks).

The coldest temperatures of the year are happening all over and there have been back to back blizzards. Interestingly, some lunatic will find a way to blame this on global warming.

Answer 2

Fired? Who made that up?

Nobody who's learned anything about geology, paleontology, or archeology can buy into the 'manmade' nonsense, let alone 'Man-Mad' as you'd termed it.

Let's see. Around the year 1000 Vikings began losing their command of the sea. Why was that?

Off top o' my head it was mid-1400s when Chaco Canyon began begin quickly abandoned when the weather became colder & drier, their irrigation failed.

There was a reason your ancestors left the old world looking for new beginnings in the new, and enough land to raise food for families.

Was it 1818, the Year With No Summer? What's that about?

Photography became more general during the US Civil War times. Watch the change in clothing as people begin wearing less, over time.

Vocabulary: Glaciation. Interglacial.

By about late 70s, 1980 we were talking about how we could limit 'emissions' BUT the problem then as now is that emerging economies were not subject to any controls and that's where most TOTAL pollution was coming from then as now. The developed west has done an excellent job reducing pollutants & cleanup. For those past decades the Pacific Rim was worst and China's exploding these days. As the world turns, this crap comes across the Pacific to the US west coast.

So if you are serious about wanting to fix something, fix them. Let us know how you'd go about that.

Answer 3

Technically, a consensus manner, in step with Merriam Webster's dictionary, one million a: typical contract : b: the judgment arrived at by way of so much of the ones involved two: organization team spirit in sentiment and perception Meaning five humans might say that two+two=five and there might be a consensus. And say those five humans have been to fund thousands of scientists to fudge information and mislead children finding out math and ostracize nonbelievers, then there might be as so much evidence that Global Warming is prompted by way of people as two+two being five. You can not turn out that two+two isn't five. Nor can the high-quality mathematician at Harvard. Food for notion.

Answer 4

You may have your facts backwards. There have been scientists as far back as the 60s who have been warning people against global warming. Those scientist lost thier jobs, and many more for beleiving that man was causing possibly catostrophic harm to the earth by means of the technological advances that made countries such as america and the UK rich. - cars, electricity, oil.

Since humanity is in denial, we did not want to face this fact and ignored it for 40+ years. Only now is it such a prevalant problem that it is being acknowledged. First by other countries, and now finally by America.

* note all cars in other countries are made to be hybrid and compact as to be more fuel efficient, except in America where we long to own a gas guzzeling Hummer H2, cause and effect - our automobile manufacturers (Ford, GM ) are suffering due to this as our worldwide sales are nil *

If your facts were correct you'd see how a white house document regarding global warming was edited by someone with no scientific background in the problem, but stron oil ties, to make it seems as if it had little or no scientific basis. see first link below.

You would also see how the issue of global warming was to be addressed by this Adminsitration long before 2007, but put aside repeatedly. Only now is it finally getting any type of respect in America. Other countries have acknowledged the seriousness of thie issue for years. See link two below.

Answer 5

Actually it is the opposite: scientists have been threatened by the Bush regime for SAYING there is global warming.

"Top NASA Scientist Says He's Being Silenced on Global Warming"
http://www.abcnews.go.com/WNT/story?id=1555183

FACTS KILL NEOCON REPUBLICANS DEAD.

Answer 6

No. Look, with over 6 Billion people on the planet now, & many of them having cars, dumping huge amounts of garbage, pollution & whatnot into the air- it does't take a scientist to figure out that we've GOT to be having a negative impact on our climate. The bottom line is, we're dirtying our nest- & it's showing signs of coming back to bite us. It's getting beyond the "discussion" phase, -it's time people started to seriously think about what we're going to DO about it.

Answer 7

that's SUCH a broad generalization and a sorry testament to how the fringe right wing nut jobs on the radio and web can brain wash the weak.
the article cited doesn't prove a f'n thing other than the state doesn't want this neocon activist koolaid drinker's unfounded solitary opinion mistaken as an official position of that state by simple goobers who want to believe what they want.

Answer 8

Global warming must be properly addressed because it is threatening the survival of mankind.

Answer 9

The only people who disagree on global warming are the jerkoffs who like to waste oil and gas by driving Humvees .

"I balance it out by driving a motorcycle"

That's like saying "I smoke crack but I take a daily vitamin to balance it out"

NOT.

Answer 10

I'm surprised, simply because man doesn't want to take the blame or responsibility for anything that is negative.