They just say whatever as if they know what they're talking about lol.
2007-02-10 11:10:41 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Television
If they got people that knew what they were talking about, they'd probably tell the truth about most of the crap they come up with.
2007-02-10 11:20:02 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
They have one person who is "everyman" to represent what the viewer would probably think of it if he/she ate the food. I agree it's not a valid way of crowning someone a world-class chef. They should all be leaders in the culinary field.
2007-02-10 19:14:50 · answer #2 · answered by martin h 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because people generally hate critics so they'd rather have opinionated amateurs rather than people who really know their stuff, kind of like the rest of the BS that is on TV now.
2007-02-10 20:24:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Some of the judges are professional food critics, but I agreee, not all of them are.
2007-02-10 19:13:20 · answer #4 · answered by tooqerq 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
actually they're usually food critics or food magazine editors.
2007-02-10 19:15:41 · answer #5 · answered by j.r. 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They just clean and dress bums on the street and feed them.
2007-02-10 19:19:13 · answer #6 · answered by NONAME 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
So they won't be biased
2007-02-10 19:14:48 · answer #7 · answered by Jennifer R 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋