Vikings to trade for Larry Fitzgerald?

Question

Rumor is Vikings want to get Fitzgeral and are willing to toss in their 1st pick to get him?
Do both teams benifit from this trade?

No lie
http://www.footballsfuture.com/news/2007/02/vikings-to-trade-for-larry-fitzgerald.html

Answer 1

i would say so. because the vikes do need a WR and Fitzy can become their moss and calvin johnson isnt falling to them so they might as well trade what will be jarrett for a already proven pro bowler in fitz. but the vikes also need to improve their D. meanwhile if this trade happens. the cards will have 2 top 10 picks, and that is very deadly because they can get 2 great players. they can pick 2 out of: alan branch, gaines adams, jamal anderson, ginn, dwayne jarrett, or trade down and get even more picks.

Answer 2

the problem with larry becoming the next "moss" is that he doesn't have the explosive speed or acceleration. for someone with as strong an arm as tarvaris jackson, the vikings should go for a speed receiver.
furthermore, the last thing the cardinals need is to lose a playmaker that will help leinart grow.

Answer 3

I think the Cardinals would benefit from this because although Fitzgerald is a good receiver, he is very injury proned. It would definitely be worth a 2nd round pick for Fitzgerald.

Answer 4

you've been talking to murdock haven't you - that's ludicrous the vikes don't even have a high pick, no way the cards would do that deal - they will probably draft dwyane jarrett, who's a similar type player

Answer 5

There is no way that Whisenhunt is getting rid of Larry Fitzgerald he is an offense minded coach with that kind of weapon. Stop smoking crack!!!!

Answer 6

NO, they would be better off using their draft pick to trade up in the draft and take Calvin Johnson...a real STUD!!

Answer 7

I would say no. The deal does not benefit the Cards at all so why make it. IT won't happen.