Is an inexact science really science at all?

Answer 1

Science as a total picture can be confusing. An inexact result meant you found nothing. I do the same...I am a Scientist. I start on a science study, not follow thru, give up, and show no result. So we have to remember to stay 'Exact' with all of our science experiements, follow them all the way to the finish line to determine the best result. But we have to remember, science experiments may not turn up a best result, just a best answer. That is what is happening in the world today. I am always asking,"What is it you are saying? You can produce such substances to operate a vehicle off of what?, Is this exact?" And no Exact Answer, but yet, claims are made it can be done!

So to answer your question, yes, there are inexact questions left unanswered, and there are exact questions answered. Sometimes exact questions, later, may turn out to inexact. So we end up at square one again....trial and error.

That was a hard question to answer. But overall my final answer is yes and no.

I hope this helps answer your question.

Answer 2

i'm at a loss why you've printed a philosophy of technology question lower than R&S. As to "Does the inexactness of technology educate that God exists? No, besides the undeniable fact that it may clarify the position the type of idea got here from. reality is ultimately of suggestions." the idea in a god or gods got here lengthy in the previous technology, it is in trouble-free terms an historic want to describe issues. All faith is organic superstition with social administration thrown in. basically because technology isn't an actual rationalization does no longer advise it isn't the most ideal rationalization. This truly it is. it is commonplace through ninety 9% of all peoples. in trouble-free terms a determined moron would say basically because it is in trouble-free terms ninety seven% maximum ideal, i am going to trust fairy tails of entire nonsense.

Answer 3

Sure it is; most science is inexact anyway if you really think about it...

Answer 4

Of course not ; the dichotomy between the sciences and the social sciences brings this into sharp relief.

Answer 5

It can be. The requirement for a theory to be science is that it must be possible to demonstrate that it is not true, and if the theory allows for an inexactitude, that is acceptable.

Answer 6

Since most "scientists" do not follow the "scientific method" there is no such thing as science. People mistake technology and the ability to use computers to make misleading statistics as being science.