Do you think this is true? This is someone's view on the beginning and end of the universe?

Question

There are actually two types of nothing.
There is an eternal nothing and a finite nothing.
The universe or anything that goes on in it is an incident,an incident has a beginning and an end.
A slug,an elephant or you has a beginning and an end.
your beginning is,sort of obvious,it came from a potential.
Your end is the end of an incident it will never happen again,it is eternal.
The universe had a beginning and it will end and never happen again,it will enter a state of eternal nothing.
Before the universe began,there was nothing,but there had to be a potential and the potential had to be finite. If it was not finite it could not have changed.
Some way a space-time pulse was initiated a fraction of a second after time zero.
This space-time pulse matured and produced us and the universe that we experience to-day.

what do you guys think of this?

That the plane of existance, time, movement , space, all had a beginning, (from nothingness) and will eventually have an end, turn back into nothingness.. and stay nothingness... forever

your thoughts?

Answer 1

I believe that the Universe has started and ended "Infinite" times. Its just a forever process of everything and nothing.


WOW it makes no sense, but it sounds good to me...

Answer 2

You give a humans birth as an example of a finite nothing and eternal nothing, right?
Before birth, we are a "finite nothing" and after death we are an "eternal nothing" ? This doesn't seem quite true....

Because, our parents manufactured the means to create us..therefore the potential for us to be born was not from us, but from them..

Using this analogy, if the universe were a finite nothing, it could not contain the potential in itself, but it came from somewhere.

This potential could have come from some "being" (if you believe in that sort of thing)... or it could have come from the "end" of another universe. Thus, when this universe ends, that energy would have to go somewhere.. possibly into another universe...

I don't know.. hard to think about.

Answer 3

The beginning of the elements of the universe is unknown to technology. Many aspect to the tremendous bang because the beginning of each and everything, besides the undeniable fact that the tremendous bang does no longer handle the problem of beginning. the tremendous bang is the attitude of boom and continues to be visibly in progression. (many situations those who examine with the tremendous bang are talking of the very early element.) The data discovered so some distance does no longer aspect out the beginning of the elements for the universe, nor does the data let us know some thing of activities happening in the previous its boom. quite than many times reciting this qualifying sentence, the tremendous bang is frequently basically suggested (incorrectly) because the starting up or "creation" of the universe. television documentaries do no longer difficulty to make the excellence. besides the undeniable fact that no longer technically maximum ideal, for most sensible discussions of the physics of the universe, it is okay. For discussions on the beginning of the universe, the mistakes is unacceptable. Guesses and suggestions on the beginning of the universe are substantial yet unsubstantiated. there are a number of of faiths which have their personal rationalization besides the undeniable fact that maximum reject all different causes yet their personal. figuring out on this variety of at random to trust does no longer look like a rational theory. besides the undeniable fact that some suggestions have the tremendous bang because the starting up of the universe, i don't understand of any medical requirement for or hostile to an infinitely lengthy gone. .

Answer 4

no its wrong..some things the human brain cannot comprehend like when Chernobyl the nuclear power plant melted. the people there that were running the show could not comprehend that it was serious..the human brain cannot comprehend..they kept saying its OK when in fact the core had melted..it wasn't a cover up it was the fact that the human brain cannot comprehend..if you get the gist of this then try to imagine that space has no beginning as it was always there with stuff in it and it will always be there with stuff in it and lots of things in it will happen lots of times an some stuff will happen never but it will always be happening and always has been. you think this is not possible.but really its just the quantum physics of the situation..your brain is not designed to or just cannot comprehend so don't try to understand it as you are not supposed to ..just to know that idea and leave it at that is enough.

Answer 5

I think we cannot know what was before the beginning or what will be after the end of the universe. If we could know then that would be part of the universe.

Answer 6

Poetic...But false. The universe has no end, just an extremely queer (messed up, not homosexual) bend. It's really weird. But there is not nothingness, sorry. But it was a lovely poem.

Answer 7

i think it is true that the universe had a beginning and will have an end. all things that exist require a beginning. if something has no beginning, it does not exist. but before making a conclusion remember to ask yourself if you are using inductive reasoning or deductive reasoning. =)

Answer 8

I'll be honest here. What the fudge cycle was that? The writing itself was a mix and mash of..., nothing comprehensible. It appears to be nothing about nothing.

Non the less I get a small glimmer of whats trying to be said.., and that is just totally ... wrong... as in filled with error. But you're welcome to your own opinion. No one will shoot you over it. Or lets hope not anyway. :-)

Answer 9

Are you actually saying that the universe sprang spontaneously from nothing on its own? Ludicrous!

Answer 10

Sounds more like someone's attempt at exitential poetry. In which case, it sucks, but I don't like poetry anyway.

If it's not poetry, it doesn't make any sense.