Liberals answer this about economics?

Question

Why would someone risk time and their money to create a business if there was no chance of a significant return on their investment?

We know that 95% of businesses fail.
We know that it takes a few years to break even.
We need entrepreneurs to start and expand new businesses to create more jobs and create economic growth.

Why then after all this do liberals think it is a good thing to tax and regulate businesses so heavily?

Answer 1

Liberals hate successful people.
Liberals hate Hard working people.
Liberals blame their failures on everyone else but themselves.
Liberals want everyone equally poor.
Liberals want everyone else pay their "fair" shares of taxes while they refuse to work hard.

Answer 2

The answer is that we don't need much more than 5% of businesses to succeed. Sure you can make a case for 6% or 7%. So then we would have 40% more business success at 7%. That would be quite a jolt to the economy.
Some might claim we could do with 4%. That would be a 20% decrease in successful businesses. The bottom line is that it's in the proper vicinity of percent of businesses that should succeed. It would not be good for instance if 25% of businesses succeeded. Because then practically everybody would try to go into business and it would end up hurting the economy. Would you actually want everybody to run a small business ? Who would mass produce the products ? The factory workers will have there own businesses.
5% give or take a few percentage points is where it should be.

Answer 3

In a nutshell, Liberals are close-minded and emotionally pushed people who've thrown out common sense and serious thinking. Left-wing professors who spew Liberal nonsense, feed off the government trough (great government = extra money at taxpayers price). Liberals are indifferent to the regulations they help, it has by no ability been approximately improving the lives of others. this is approximately feeling stable approximately themselves. fact/historic previous has no place in Liberalism, because it contradicts each thing they carry expensive. If a coverage helps a liberal experience morally more suitable, that it would desire to do extra harm than stable is punctiliously beside the point. they're no longer able to work out previous the instantaneous emotional gratification. Liberalism is an all encompassing ideology, a faith via the different call.

Answer 4

for the possible betterment of the community/nation? aka the goodness of your heart (and no one is saying you can't make some money on the side, but you said "significant" which I would assume would be much more than "some money")

why do those that constantly talk about the failing morality of our nation (conservatives usually) seem to be the same people that constantly tout that greed is the only decent motivator for mankind?

it's like you say "everyone should be good"... but then turn around and say "but it's not realistic enough to base an economy off of"... a bit of rationalization there...

would "do it for America" be a decent enough motivator for most people?

maybe I'm just a hopeless optimist...

and "heavily" is a variable term... I think there are lines to business regulation and taxation... it often seems to me that conservatives are on the "light side" and liberals may be on the "heavy side"... maybe we equal out in the middle?

Answer 5

The Liberal ideology is a theory which holds forth beliefs that have no basis in reality.
They are Advocates of a policy that empowers a strong government to enslave its people with a high tax burden incident to the support of extravagant and unnecessary social programs destructive to both the work ethic among the lower class, and the incentive to innovate and succeed among the working class.
The problems we face today are because the people who work for a living are outnumbered by those who vote for a living.
A democracy will continue to exist up until
the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous
gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority
always votes for the candidates who promise the most benefits from
the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally
collapse over loose fiscal policy

Answer 6

All that is ask is a fair chair to be contribute to society to create a cycle of prosperity. After all what good is to have a business if no one have money to buy your products. If you grant to low taxes it just create an unbalanced economy where people are rich or poor.

Answer 7

Because the 11 million illegal aliens got (and then some) the 2.4 million jobs created during the Bush administration?



duhhh!

Answer 8

The businesses that become wildly successful need to be responsible, and moral. There is way too much greed in big business. They need checks.

Answer 9

why is it a good idea to waste billions of dollars on a war against terrorism that fails (where as, you can never really have a war against terrorism b/c terrorists could develop from any country/time period, etc.) and plunge our nation into an 8 trillion dollar debt where we will never have the means to spend towards failed businesses while we expect our future generations to pay at their own expense

businesses fail all the time, while at the same time, other businesses are prosperous and will take their places

Answer 10

Perhaps if people could get decent jobs with decent wages and benefits they wouldn't feel compelled to start a business that has a 95 % failure rate.

Answer 11

There is no good answer because you are right. If everyone who worked at a fast food place made a living wage a Happy meal would cost $17.00.