English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

8 answers

If he isn't, he should be. Why refuse DNA test to prove paternity if you aren't up to something. Claim on the baby takes him right to the $.

2007-02-10 09:56:37 · answer #1 · answered by LucySD 7 · 0 0

I think he was negligent in keeping drugs away from Danny and Anna since he could see they had a problem with over indulging. Who was the gofer that went out and brought the drugs in to Anna?

Step up to the plate and do the right thing Howard and get the DNA tests done and maybe we won't be so suspicious of you.

2007-02-10 19:12:04 · answer #2 · answered by p00756 4 · 0 0

not yet, but i always thought he had something to do with danny's death and i think he did with anna. i hope he doesnt get the baby.

2007-02-10 17:56:22 · answer #3 · answered by Moniluv 2 · 0 0

I'm too lazy and this is too cryptic for me right now.

Good luck with this.

2007-02-10 17:55:23 · answer #4 · answered by pyg 4 · 1 0

No but he should be. He's a creepy and greedy opportunist it seems.

2007-02-10 17:57:12 · answer #5 · answered by cats 7 · 0 0

Not yet. But sure will.

2007-02-10 17:54:53 · answer #6 · answered by Cister 7 · 0 0

Surely he must be.

2007-02-10 17:55:21 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

to me he is

2007-02-10 17:55:31 · answer #8 · answered by :-) Lovely(-: 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers