2007-02-10 09:33:57 · 6 answers · asked by Northern_Eagle 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Other - Cultures & Groups
I can tell you the correct answer.
Michaelangelo made an error. The statue is anatomically incorrect because it shows David as intact i.e. still having a foreskin.
David was a Jew and would have been circumcised at around 8 days old.
2007-02-16 04:19:55 · answer #1 · answered by Jake D 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I don't think the statue was when it was carved. Now it appears neutered!
2007-02-10 23:00:47 · answer #2 · answered by blakree 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, and believe it of not you can buy postcards there that actually just show it.
2007-02-10 17:41:43 · answer #3 · answered by Boston Bluefish 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Google it, If it is intrest to you, I sure care less.
2007-02-10 18:19:53 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
yes ... with a chisel
2007-02-10 17:37:06 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
its hard to tell, cause he is soo tiny, but I doubt it.
2007-02-10 17:44:57 · answer #6 · answered by $0.02 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋