.
They say that CIA agent Plame was nothing even though her job was our protection.
2007-02-10 09:12:03 · 11 answers · asked by Chi Guy 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Anyone who outs a CIA agent has committed a serious Federal Crime and should be punished to the full extent of the law, no matter how high up it goes on the political food chain. This crime was committed to silence critics of the administration's false claim they were promoting about Saddam acquiring nuclear material, and this kind of behavior must not be tolerated, as it is not only unAmerican, it is a serious crime, and it is a threat to our already beleagered intelligence community. Any attempt to silence or belittle this crime, as if it were only partisan bickering and "sour grapes," is an grave insult to those who risk their lives for us in the very dangerous world of covert foreign intelligence.
2007-02-10 09:18:26 · answer #1 · answered by michaelsan 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
The BBC reported seveal of her secret contacts have also suffered as a result of the Bush Whitehouse outing her.
We may never know the depths of this (It's the CIA) She could be listed on the pay-role as a janitor. But her international expense account would show she had been cleaning house all over the world.
Go big Red Go
2007-02-10 09:31:06 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
They know too much about neo-con activities. They must be made to look like idiots in case one of the spills the beans. Do the names Valerie Plame and Joe Wilson ring a bell?
2016-05-25 04:20:52 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. Neocons are patriots who want what is best for the country. The fact that some Neocons differed with the CIA on some matters doesn't change that. Do you always agree with the CIA? They said that WMD's in Iraq were a "slam dunk".
2007-02-10 09:56:17 · answer #4 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Amen. Conservatives hate America and the Civil Rights and Civil Liberties that she stands for. That's why they outed Plame, started a war that will bankrupt us and destroy our military, and use hate as a political tool to corrupt the democratic process.
2007-02-10 11:32:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I support the field CIA agents the desk jockeys is being such a big deal than why are you out raged at the New York Times for leaking secrets.
Funny how liberals care about just one desk jocky but more than willing to risk all the "invisibles" in the name of "Freedom of the Press"
So when did you stop dancing on 9/11.
Just wondering.
2007-02-10 09:18:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
So true. The cons fanatically support the troops, why not CIA operatives?
2007-02-10 09:16:58 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Neo-con is an illegal US word. You could go to prison if you mention it
2007-02-10 09:32:13 · answer #8 · answered by Mr. America. 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Correct me if I am wrong, I know I am new to this, but, if I remember correctly, from reading the rules, you are in violation of Community guidelines, with unnecessary name calling content. Please rethink your questions, and ask them as an adult, I think you would get better responses, and you may learn something from them too.
2007-02-10 09:23:08 · answer #9 · answered by Hannibal 2 · 5⤊ 3⤋
Leaking top secret information for political gain is treason.
2007-02-10 09:14:36 · answer #10 · answered by Groovy 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋