i recently asked the question if a positive hair follicle drug test was sufficient evidence for me to SEEK supervised visitation while my X visits with my 5 year old. my X has admitted to the courts that he is an addict (crack/coke). recently he failed a drug test, but the judge will not order supervision for his visitation of our child. does anyone know of a precedent where a positive test is sufficient to immediately order supervision. he currently has unsupervised visitation.
2007-02-10 09:07:29 · 5 answers · asked by graymonkey1 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
go get an attorney. ask social services what they think, they have a major effect on what the courts rule.
2007-02-10 09:13:39 · answer #1 · answered by lidakamo 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It just depends, a hair follicle test can determine when the last time a person used the drug, and if it is recent enough it could, it also depends on the judge.
2016-05-25 04:20:40 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your ex must be on either parole or probation if he submitted to a hair follicle test. If so contact his judge as well as pursuing a restraining order to protect yourself and your child. Sounds like he will be looking at some jail or prison time either way.
2007-02-10 09:18:32 · answer #3 · answered by nitroeater1 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No i canot say he has to be proved to be unfit if you can prove that your childs life is in danger then you have a case..
2007-02-10 09:11:44 · answer #4 · answered by Mary O 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
that should b enough
2007-02-10 09:12:11 · answer #5 · answered by shannonlee05@sbcglobal.net 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋